Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Section of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):132-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
Arthrogryposis is a clinical finding that is present either as a feature of a neuromuscular condition or as part of a systemic disease in over 400 Mendelian conditions. The underlying molecular etiology remains largely unknown because of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. We applied exome sequencing (ES) in a cohort of 89 families with the clinical sign of arthrogryposis. Additional molecular techniques including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) were performed on individuals who were found to have pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) and mosaicism, respectively. A molecular diagnosis was established in 65.2% (58/89) of families. Eleven out of 58 families (19.0%) showed evidence for potential involvement of pathogenic variation at more than one locus, probably driven by absence of heterozygosity (AOH) burden due to identity-by-descent (IBD). RYR3, MYOM2, ERGIC1, SPTBN4, and ABCA7 represent genes, identified in two or more families, for which mutations are probably causative for arthrogryposis. We also provide evidence for the involvement of CNVs in the etiology of arthrogryposis and for the idea that both mono-allelic and bi-allelic variants in the same gene cause either similar or distinct syndromes. We were able to identify the molecular etiology in nine out of 20 families who underwent reanalysis. In summary, our data from family-based ES further delineate the molecular etiology of arthrogryposis, yielded several candidate disease-associated genes, and provide evidence for mutational burden in a biological pathway or network. Our study also highlights the importance of reanalysis of individuals with unsolved diagnoses in conjunction with sequencing extended family members.
先天性关节挛缩症是一种临床表现,存在于 400 多种孟德尔疾病中的神经肌肉疾病或系统性疾病中。由于遗传和表型异质性,其潜在的分子病因在很大程度上仍是未知的。我们在 89 个具有先天性关节挛缩症临床特征的家族中应用外显子组测序(ES)。对发现致病性拷贝数变异(CNV)和嵌合体的个体分别进行了阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)和液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)等其他分子技术。在 89 个家庭中,有 65.2%(58/89)建立了分子诊断。在 58 个家庭中,有 11 个(19.0%)显示出一个以上潜在致病变异位点的证据,这可能是由于同源性(IBD)导致的杂合缺失(AOH)负担所致。RYR3、MYOM2、ERGIC1、SPTBN4 和 ABCA7 代表在两个或两个以上家庭中确定的基因,这些基因的突变可能是导致先天性关节挛缩症的原因。我们还提供了 CNV 参与先天性关节挛缩症病因的证据,并认为同一基因中的单等位基因和双等位基因变异可导致相似或不同的综合征。在重新分析的 20 个家庭中的 9 个家庭中,我们能够确定分子病因。总之,我们基于家族的 ES 数据进一步阐明了先天性关节挛缩症的分子病因,确定了几个候选疾病相关基因,并提供了该基因在生物途径或网络中突变负担的证据。我们的研究还强调了对未解决诊断的个体进行重新分析以及对扩展家族成员进行测序的重要性。