Suppr超能文献

前瞻性生物标志物研究在晚期 RAS 野生型结直肠癌中:POSIBA 试验(GEMCAD 10-02)。

Prospective Biomarker Study in Advanced RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: POSIBA Trial (GEMCAD 10-02).

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):e1115-e1122. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0728. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

RAS testing is used to select patients with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies sensitivity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, other biomarkers such as BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and p-IGF-1R+/MMP7+ (double positive [DP] phenotype) have not been prospectively assessed to predict anti-EGFR resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a multicenter prospective trial (NCT01276379) to evaluate whether the biomarkers BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation/PTEN loss, and DP phenotype can improve the prediction for 12-months progression-free survival (PFS) over the use of clinical variables exclusively in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC treated with standard chemotherapy plus biweekly cetuximab as first-line therapy. The planned sample size was 170 RAS WT patients to detect a 20% difference in 12-month PFS based on the analysis of clinical and selected biomarkers (α = .05, β = .2). The discriminatory capacity of the biomarkers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

We included 181 RAS WT patients. The biomarker distribution was as follows: BRAF mutant, 20 patients (11%); PIK3CA mutated/PTEN loss, 98 patients (58%); DP, 23 patients (12.7%). The clinical variables in the clinical score were progression status >0, left-sided tumor, and resectable liver metastasis as the only metastatic site. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score containing the clinical variables was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.75). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and BRAF mutational status was 0.68 (0.61-0.75, = .37). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and PI3KCA mutation/PTEN status was 0.69 (0.61-0.76, = .32). The AUC of the score with clinical variables and DP phenotype was 0.66 (0.58-0.73, = .09).

CONCLUSION

The addition of BRAF, PIK3CA/PTEN, and DP to a clinical score does not improve the discrimination of 12-month PFS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This prospective biomarker design study has important clinical implications because many prospective clinical trials are designed with the hypothesis that BRAF mutation per se and MEK and PIK3CA downstream pathways are critical for colorectal tumor survival. The results lead to the question of whether these pathways should be considered as passengers instead of drivers.

摘要

背景

RAS 检测用于选择转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗敏感的患者。然而,其他生物标志物,如 BRAF、PIK3CA/PTEN 和 p-IGF-1R+/MMP7+(双阳性[DP]表型),尚未前瞻性评估以预测抗 EGFR 耐药性。

材料和方法

我们设计了一项多中心前瞻性试验(NCT01276379),以评估在 RAS 野生型(WT)mCRC 患者中,在标准化疗加每两周一次西妥昔单抗作为一线治疗的情况下,BRAF 突变、PIK3CA 突变/PTEN 缺失和 DP 表型等生物标志物是否可以改善对 12 个月无进展生存期(PFS)的预测,而不仅仅是使用临床变量。计划的样本量为 170 名 RAS WT 患者,以根据临床和选定的生物标志物分析检测到 12 个月 PFS 差异 20%(α=0.05,β=0.2)。使用受试者工作特征曲线评估生物标志物的鉴别能力。

结果

我们纳入了 181 名 RAS WT 患者。生物标志物分布如下:BRAF 突变,20 名患者(11%);PIK3CA 突变/PTEN 缺失,98 名患者(58%);DP,23 名患者(12.7%)。临床评分中的临床变量为进展状态>0、左侧肿瘤和可切除的肝转移灶作为唯一的转移灶。包含临床变量的评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.67(95%置信区间[CI],0.60-0.75)。包含临床变量和 BRAF 突变状态的评分的 AUC 为 0.68(0.61-0.75,=0.37)。包含临床变量和 PI3KCA 突变/PTEN 状态的评分的 AUC 为 0.69(0.61-0.76,=0.32)。包含临床变量和 DP 表型的评分的 AUC 为 0.66(0.58-0.73,=0.09)。

结论

BRAF、PIK3CA/PTEN 和 DP 添加到临床评分中并不能提高 12 个月 PFS 的区分度。

临床意义

这项前瞻性生物标志物设计研究具有重要的临床意义,因为许多前瞻性临床试验的假设是 BRAF 突变本身和 MEK 和 PIK3CA 下游途径对于结直肠肿瘤的生存至关重要。结果引发了一个问题,即这些途径是否应被视为乘客而不是驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e756/6853109/bf3770f60535/onco13010-fig-0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验