Suppr超能文献

一项新创建的以患者为中心的工具与医保.gov计划查找器的比较可用性研究,以帮助医疗保险受益人选择处方药计划。

Comparative Usability Study of a Newly Created Patient-Centered Tool and Medicare.gov Plan Finder to Help Medicare Beneficiaries Choose Prescription Drug Plans.

作者信息

Stults Cheryl D, Fattahi Sayeh, Meehan Amy, Bundorf M Kate, Chan Albert S, Pun Ting, Tai-Seale Ming

机构信息

Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA.

Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2019 Mar;6(1):81-86. doi: 10.1177/2374373518778343. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In response to reported difficulties in selecting a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, we designed a patient-centered online Part D plan selection tool (CHOICE1.0) to simplify the selection process and to provide personalized, expert recommendations.

METHODS

This ethnographic comparative usability study observed 44 patients using the first version of the tool during Medicare 2016 Open Enrollment. Participants were observed as they chose their drug plan using Medicare.gov and 1 of 3 versions of CHOICE1.0 that varied in amount of expert guidance. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze exit survey data. The observations were video-recorded, and field notes were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Participants were significantly more satisfied with CHOICE1.0 for choosing a plan, understanding information, and ease of use compared to Medicare.gov. Those using expert versions of CHOICE1.0 were more likely to indicate their intention to switch plans than those using Medicare.gov, though they wanted to know the source and content.

CONCLUSION

The more patient-centered prescription drug choice tool improved user experience and enabled users to choose plans more consistent with expert recommendations.

摘要

引言

针对所报告的在选择医疗保险D部分处方药计划时存在的困难,我们设计了一个以患者为中心的在线D部分计划选择工具(CHOICE1.0),以简化选择过程并提供个性化的专家建议。

方法

这项人种学比较可用性研究观察了44名患者在2016年医疗保险开放注册期间使用该工具的第一个版本的情况。观察参与者使用Medicare.gov和3个版本的CHOICE1.0中的1个来选择他们的药品计划,这3个版本在专家指导量上有所不同。使用描述性统计分析退出调查数据。观察过程进行了视频记录,并对现场笔记进行了主题分析。

结果

与Medicare.gov相比,参与者对CHOICE1.0在选择计划、理解信息和易用性方面的满意度明显更高。使用CHOICE1.0专家版本的人比使用Medicare.gov的人更有可能表示他们有更换计划的意向,尽管他们想了解来源和内容。

结论

这个更以患者为中心的处方药选择工具改善了用户体验,并使用户能够选择更符合专家建议的计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fc1/6572936/3f831c585a0f/10.1177_2374373518778343-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验