Pfützenreuter Glaucia Regina, Cavalieri Juliana Coutinho, Fragoso Ana Paula de Oliveira, Da Corregio Karine Souza, Freitas Paulo Fontoura, Trapani Alberto
Hospital Regional de São José Homero de Miranda Gomes, São José, SC, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Jun;41(6):363-370. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688966. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
To evaluate the results of induced labor and to determine the main factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section after patients being submitted to this procedure at the Hospital Universitário of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (HU/UFSC, in the Portuguese acronym), Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil.
A retrospective cross-sectional study that included all the pregnancies that resulted in single-fetus births, whose gestational-age was > 22 weeks and that had been submitted to labor induction at the HU/UFSC in the period from 2013 to 2016.
During the proposed period, 1,491 pregnant women were submitted to the labor induction protocol. In 1,264 cases (84.8%), induction resulted in labor, with 830 (65.7%) progressing to vaginal delivery. Gestational age ≥ 41 + 0 weeks was the most common indication for induced labor (55.2%), and vaginal administration of misoprostol was the most commonly used method (72.0%). Among these pregnant women, the cesarean section rate was of 34.3%. Considering the cases of induction failure, the cesarean section rate rose to 44.3%. The factors associated with cesarean section were: previous history of cesarean delivery (PR [prevalence ratio] = 1.48; 95%CI [confidence interval]: 1.51-1.88), fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (PR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.32-2.19), Bishop score ≤ 6 (PR = 1.33; 95%CI: 1.01-1.82), and induction time either < 12 hours (PR = 1.44; 95%CI: 1.17-1.66) or > 36 hours (PR = 1.51; 95%CI 1.22-1.92) between the beginning of the induction and the birth.
Labor induction was successful in most patients. In the cases in which the final outcome was a cesarean section, the most strongly associated factors were: previous history of cesarean delivery, presence of fetuses with IUGR, and either excessively short or excessively long periods of induction.
评估在巴西圣卡塔琳娜州弗洛里亚诺波利斯市圣卡塔琳娜联邦大学医院(葡萄牙语简称为HU/UFSC)接受引产手术的患者的引产结果,并确定与产时剖宫产相关的主要因素。
一项回顾性横断面研究,纳入了所有单胎妊娠、孕周>22周且于2013年至2016年期间在HU/UFSC接受引产的孕妇。
在研究期间,1491名孕妇接受了引产方案。1264例(84.8%)引产成功启动产程,其中830例(65.7%)进展为阴道分娩。孕周≥41+0周是引产最常见的指征(55.2%),阴道给予米索前列醇是最常用的方法(72.0%)。这些孕妇的剖宫产率为34.3%。在引产失败的病例中,剖宫产率升至44.3%。与剖宫产相关的因素有:既往剖宫产史(PR[患病率比值]=1.48;95%CI[置信区间]:1.51-1.88)、胎儿宫内生长受限(IUGR)(PR=1.82;95%CI:1.32-2.19)、Bishop评分≤6(PR=1.33;95%CI:1.01-1.82)以及引产开始至分娩的时间<12小时(PR=I.44;95%CI:1.17-1.66)或>36小时(PR=1.51;95%CI 1.22-1.92)。
大多数患者引产成功。在最终结局为剖宫产的病例中,最密切相关的因素是:既往剖宫产史、存在胎儿宫内生长受限以及引产时间过短或过长。