Translational Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.
Laboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNESC), Criciúma, SC, Brazil.
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;25(1):94-113. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0448-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic affective disorder with extreme mood swings that include mania or hypomania and depression. Though the exact mechanism of BD is unknown, neuroinflammation is one of the numerous investigated etiopathophysiological causes of BD. This article presents a systematic review of the data regarding brain inflammation evaluating microglia, astrocytes, cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and other inflammatory markers in postmortem BD brain samples. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA recommendations, and relevant studies were identified by searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, LILACS, IBECS, and Web of Science databases for peer-reviewed journal articles published by March 2019. Quality of included studies appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Among the 1814 articles included in the primary screening, 51 articles measured inflammatory markers in postmortem BD brain samples. A number of studies have shown evidence of inflammation in BD postmortem brain samples. However, an absolute statement cannot be concluded whether neuroinflammation is present in BD due to the large number of studies did not evaluate the presence of infiltrating peripheral immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma, cytokines levels, and microglia activation in the same postmortem brain sample. For example, out of 15 studies that evaluated microglia cells markers, 8 studies found no effect of BD on these cells. Similarly, 17 out of 51 studies evaluating astrocytes markers, 9 studies did not find any effect of BD on astrocyte cells, whereas 8 studies found a decrease and 2 studies presented both increase and decrease in different brain regions. In addition, multiple factors account for the variability across the studies, including postmortem interval, brain area studied, age at diagnosis, undergoing treatment, and others. Future analyses should rectify these potential sources of heterogeneity and reach a consensus regarding the inflammatory markers in postmortem BD brain samples.
双相情感障碍(BD)是一种慢性情感障碍,其极端情绪波动包括躁狂或轻躁狂和抑郁。尽管 BD 的确切机制尚不清楚,但神经炎症是众多研究的 BD 发病机制之一。本文对评估死后 BD 大脑样本中小胶质细胞、星形胶质细胞、细胞因子、趋化因子、黏附分子和其他炎症标志物的脑炎症数据进行了系统评价。这项系统评价是根据 PRISMA 建议进行的,通过在 PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、LILACS、IBECS 和 Web of Science 数据库中搜索 2019 年 3 月之前发表的同行评议期刊文章,确定了相关研究。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估纳入研究的质量。在初步筛选中包括的 1814 篇文章中,有 51 篇文章测量了死后 BD 大脑样本中的炎症标志物。许多研究表明,BD 死后大脑样本存在炎症的证据。然而,由于大量研究没有评估中枢神经系统(CNS)实质中浸润的外周免疫细胞、细胞因子水平和同一死后大脑样本中的小胶质细胞激活情况,因此不能得出神经炎症是否存在于 BD 中的绝对结论。例如,在评估小胶质细胞标志物的 15 项研究中,有 8 项研究没有发现 BD 对这些细胞有影响。同样,在评估星形胶质细胞标志物的 51 项研究中,有 9 项研究没有发现 BD 对星形胶质细胞有影响,而 8 项研究发现星形胶质细胞减少,2 项研究则在不同脑区呈现增加和减少。此外,多种因素导致了研究之间的变异性,包括死后间隔时间、研究的大脑区域、诊断时的年龄、正在接受的治疗等。未来的分析应该纠正这些潜在的异质性来源,并就死后 BD 大脑样本中的炎症标志物达成共识。