患者参与及其评估工具——当前挑战与未来方向 述评“医疗保健组织和系统级决策中的患者参与度的衡量标准和评估工具：系统评价”。
Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
机构信息
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
出版信息
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):378-380. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16.
Abstract
Considering the growing recognition of the importance of patient engagement in healthcare decisions, research and delivery systems, it is important to ensure high quality and efficient patient engagement evaluation tools. In this commentary, we will first highlight the definition and importance of patient engagement. Then we discuss the psychometric properties of the patient engagement evaluation tools identified in a recent review on patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decision-making. Lastly, we suggest future directions for patient engagement and its evaluation tools.
摘要
考虑到患者参与医疗决策、研究和交付系统的重要性日益得到认可，确保高质量、高效率的患者参与评估工具至关重要。在这篇评论中，我们首先将强调患者参与的定义和重要性。然后，我们将讨论最近关于患者参与医疗组织和系统层面决策的综述中确定的患者参与评估工具的心理测量特性。最后，我们为患者参与及其评估工具提出了未来的发展方向。
相似文献
1
Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools- Current Challenges and Future Directions Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):378-380. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.16.
2
Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):889-903. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43.
3
Metrics of Patient, Public, Consumer, and Community Engagement in Healthcare Systems: How Should We Define Engagement, What Are We Measuring, and Does It Matter for Patient Care? Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):49-50. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.94.
4
Delving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Apr 1;8(4):247-249. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.126.
5
Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):51-54. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.99.
6
From Craft to Reflective Art and Science Comment on "Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review".
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):124-127. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.108.
7
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084. doi: 10.1111/hex.12804. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 15;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-175.
引用本文的文献
1
Four year evaluation of a parent advisory group to support a research program for knowledge translation in child health.
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 28;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00547-5.
2
Patient and family engagement in infection prevention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: defining a consensus framework using the Q methodology - NOSO-COVID study protocol.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 22;12(7):e056172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056172.
3
Hospital capacity for patient engagement in planning and improving health services: a cross-sectional survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06174-0.
4
The Why, Who, What, How, and When of Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organizations: A Response to Recent Commentaries.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Sep 1;8(9):573-574. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.42.
本文引用的文献
1
Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):889-903. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43.
2
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084. doi: 10.1111/hex.12804. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
Taking patient reported outcomes centre stage in cancer research - why has it taken so long?
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jul 19;4:25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0109-z. eCollection 2018.
4
How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline.
Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.
5
[Not Available].
Sante Publique. 2015 Mar-Apr;1 Suppl:41-50.
6
An Early Assessment of Accountable Care Organizations' Efforts to Engage Patients and Their Families.
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Oct;72(5):580-604. doi: 10.1177/1077558715588874. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
7
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
8
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
9
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
10
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Zotero 插件