Center for Evolutionary Psychology, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660 , USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 10;286(1906):20190985. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0985. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
Why would individuals hide positive information about themselves? Evolutionary game theorists have recently developed the signal-burying game as a simple model to shed light on this puzzle. They have shown that the game has an equilibrium where some agents are better off deliberately reducing the visibility of the signal by which they broadcast their positive traits. However, this equilibrium also features individuals who fully broadcast their positive traits. Here, we show that the signal-burying framework can also explain modesty norms that everyone adheres to: the game contains an equilibrium where all agents who send a signal voluntarily reduce its conspicuousness. Surprisingly, the stability of the two kinds of equilibria rely on very different principles. The equilibrium where some agents brag is stable because of costly signalling dynamics. By contrast, the universal modesty equilibrium exists because buried signals contain probabilistic information about a sender's type, and receivers make optimal use of this information. In the latter equilibrium, burying a signal can be understood as a handicap which makes the signal more honest, but honesty is not achieved through standard costly signalling dynamics.
为什么个人会隐藏自己的正面信息?进化博弈论学者最近开发了信号埋藏博弈作为一个简单的模型来揭示这个难题。他们表明,在这个博弈中有一个平衡点,在这个平衡点上,一些代理人通过故意降低他们广播自己积极特征的信号的可见性而获得更好的结果。然而,这个平衡点也存在完全广播自己积极特征的个体。在这里,我们表明信号埋藏框架也可以解释每个人都遵守的谦虚规范:博弈包含一个平衡点,所有发送信号的代理人都会自愿降低信号的显著性。令人惊讶的是,这两种平衡点的稳定性依赖于非常不同的原则。一些代理人吹嘘的平衡点是稳定的,因为信号传递是有代价的。相比之下,普遍的谦虚平衡点是因为埋藏的信号包含了发送者类型的概率信息,而接收者会充分利用这些信息。在后一个平衡点中,埋藏信号可以被理解为一种使信号更诚实的劣势,但诚实不是通过标准的代价高昂的信号传递动态来实现的。