Suppr超能文献

信号隐匿博弈中的通用谦逊。

Universal modesty in signal-burying games.

机构信息

Center for Evolutionary Psychology, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660 , USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 10;286(1906):20190985. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0985. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Abstract

Why would individuals hide positive information about themselves? Evolutionary game theorists have recently developed the signal-burying game as a simple model to shed light on this puzzle. They have shown that the game has an equilibrium where some agents are better off deliberately reducing the visibility of the signal by which they broadcast their positive traits. However, this equilibrium also features individuals who fully broadcast their positive traits. Here, we show that the signal-burying framework can also explain modesty norms that everyone adheres to: the game contains an equilibrium where all agents who send a signal voluntarily reduce its conspicuousness. Surprisingly, the stability of the two kinds of equilibria rely on very different principles. The equilibrium where some agents brag is stable because of costly signalling dynamics. By contrast, the universal modesty equilibrium exists because buried signals contain probabilistic information about a sender's type, and receivers make optimal use of this information. In the latter equilibrium, burying a signal can be understood as a handicap which makes the signal more honest, but honesty is not achieved through standard costly signalling dynamics.

摘要

为什么个人会隐藏自己的正面信息?进化博弈论学者最近开发了信号埋藏博弈作为一个简单的模型来揭示这个难题。他们表明,在这个博弈中有一个平衡点,在这个平衡点上,一些代理人通过故意降低他们广播自己积极特征的信号的可见性而获得更好的结果。然而,这个平衡点也存在完全广播自己积极特征的个体。在这里,我们表明信号埋藏框架也可以解释每个人都遵守的谦虚规范:博弈包含一个平衡点,所有发送信号的代理人都会自愿降低信号的显著性。令人惊讶的是,这两种平衡点的稳定性依赖于非常不同的原则。一些代理人吹嘘的平衡点是稳定的,因为信号传递是有代价的。相比之下,普遍的谦虚平衡点是因为埋藏的信号包含了发送者类型的概率信息,而接收者会充分利用这些信息。在后一个平衡点中,埋藏信号可以被理解为一种使信号更诚实的劣势,但诚实不是通过标准的代价高昂的信号传递动态来实现的。

相似文献

1
Universal modesty in signal-burying games.
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jul 10;286(1906):20190985. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0985. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
2
The signal-burying game can explain why we obscure positive traits and good deeds.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):397-404. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0354-z. Epub 2018 May 28.
3
Honesty in signalling games is maintained by trade-offs rather than costs.
BMC Biol. 2023 Jan 8;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01496-9.
4
Signalling among relatives. II. Beyond the tower of Babel.
Theor Popul Biol. 1998 Oct;54(2):146-60. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1372.
5
Why not lie? Costs enforce honesty in an experimental signalling game.
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Nov 13;281(1774):20132457. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2457. Print 2014 Jan 7.
6
Signaling equilibria in sensorimotor interactions.
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Dynamic stability and basins of attraction in the Sir Philip Sidney game.
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 22;277(1689):1915-22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2105. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
8
Separating equilibria in continuous signalling games.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1595-606. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1068.
9
Economic principles in communication: an experimental study.
J Theor Biol. 2014 Dec 21;363:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.035. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
10
An evolutionary advantage for extravagant honesty.
J Theor Biol. 2012 Jan 7;292:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The signal-burying game can explain why we obscure positive traits and good deeds.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):397-404. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0354-z. Epub 2018 May 28.
2
Maimonides' ladder: States of mutual knowledge and the perception of charitability.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):158-173. doi: 10.1037/xge0000507. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 21;114(8):1874-1879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614389114. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
4
Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: inter- and intranational differences.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):869-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.869.
5
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):766-794. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.
6
Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game.
J Theor Biol. 1989 Jan 9;136(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80188-2.
7
Biological signals as handicaps.
J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8.
8
Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.
J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验