Suppr超能文献

整形与重建外科门诊中陪护人员的使用:患者视角

Chaperone Use in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Outpatient Clinics: The Patient Perspective.

作者信息

Vakayil Victor, Kim Nicholas, Barta Jo, Choudry Umar

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Dec;83(6):e68-e71. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001927.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient perspectives on chaperone use during examinations, especially in surgical subspecialties, are understudied. We aimed to identify specific patient cohorts that desire the presence of chaperones and compare patient and surgeon perspectives, all in an effort to improve quality of care.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We prospectively administered a 15-question survey to all patients visiting 2 plastic surgery outpatient clinics between January 2015 and April 2016. Data on demographics, types of procedures (cosmetic or reconstructive), area of examination (sensitive or nonsensitive), views on chaperone use, type of chaperone, and instances of inappropriate behavior by surgeons were collected. Univariate analysis was performed after stratifying patients on their individual desire to have a chaperone. Subsequently, multivariate regression models were constructed to identify individual patient cohorts independently more likely to require a chaperone.

RESULTS

A total of 398 participants were surveyed. There were 58.3% female and 41.7% male respondents; of whom 41.8% were 55 years or older and 8.1% were younger than 24 years. Ninety percent of all patients were receiving care for a reconstructive procedure. Most (77%) were being examined over a nonsensitive area. Overall, 82.1% preferred not to have a chaperone present during examinations. Most (72.6%) felt the sex of the examining physician was inconsequential to their need for a chaperone. Most (54.8%) preferred either a family member or a friend to be the chaperone. Only 1.8% (n = 7) experienced inappropriate behavior, of whom 77% (n = 5) noted the absence of a chaperone while being examined. On multivariate analysis, younger patients and examination over a sensitive area were independently associated with a higher odd of requiring a chaperone (odds ratios, 3.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.9; P = 0.016] and 3.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.9-6.7; P < 0.001], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients did not want a chaperone during examinations. Younger patients and those having a sensitive area examined were independently more likely to desire a chaperone. Patients preferred having their family member or friend as their chaperone. Given the major differences in perceptions, plastic surgeons should consider selectively using chaperones rather than the carte blanche use of chaperones with every patient.

摘要

引言

对于患者在检查期间(尤其是在外科亚专业领域)使用陪护人员的看法,研究较少。我们旨在确定希望有陪护人员在场的特定患者群体,并比较患者和外科医生的观点,以提高护理质量。

方法和材料

2015年1月至2016年4月期间,我们对两家整形外科门诊的所有就诊患者前瞻性地进行了一项包含15个问题的调查。收集了有关人口统计学、手术类型(美容或重建)、检查部位(敏感或非敏感)、对使用陪护人员的看法、陪护人员类型以及外科医生不当行为实例的数据。在根据患者个人对陪护人员的需求进行分层后进行单因素分析。随后,构建多因素回归模型以确定更有可能独立需要陪护人员的个体患者群体。

结果

共调查了398名参与者。女性受访者占58.3%,男性受访者占41.7%;其中41.8%的患者年龄在55岁及以上,8.1%的患者年龄小于24岁。所有患者中有90%正在接受重建手术治疗。大多数(77%)患者接受的是非敏感部位的检查。总体而言,82.1%的患者在检查期间不希望有陪护人员在场。大多数(72.6%)患者认为检查医生的性别与他们对陪护人员的需求无关。大多数(54.8%)患者更喜欢家庭成员或朋友作为陪护人员。只有1.8%(n = 7)经历过不当行为,其中77%(n = 5)指出在检查时没有陪护人员在场。多因素分析显示,年轻患者和敏感部位的检查独立与需要陪护人员的较高几率相关(比值比分别为3.4[95%置信区间,1.3 - 8.9;P = 0.016]和3.9[95%置信区间,1.9 - 6.7;P < 0.001])。

结论

大多数患者在检查期间不希望有陪护人员。年轻患者和接受敏感部位检查的患者独立更有可能希望有陪护人员。患者更喜欢让家庭成员或朋友作为他们的陪护人员。鉴于看法上的重大差异,整形外科医生应考虑选择性地使用陪护人员,而不是对每位患者一概而论地使用陪护人员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验