Dias Nancy, Hendricks-Ferguson Verna L, Wei Holly, Boring Elizabeth, Sewell Kerry, Haase Joan E
1 College of Nursing/Department of Nursing Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
2 RN to BSN Program, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;36(12):1124-1133. doi: 10.1177/1049909119858931. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
The purpose of this systematic literature review is to describe the interventions for bereaved parents, evaluate intervention effectiveness through study methodology rigor, replicability, and theoretical foundations.
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed (1966-2018), CINAHL (1937-present), PsycINFO (1887-present), and Embase (1947-present) using various search words and MeSH terms related to the study purpose. A blinded screening of title/abstract was performed, with conflicting inclusion decisions resolved through group discussions. Matrices for remaining articles were created and discussed among the team. The levels of evidence of the 9 records were rated from very low to high based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines.
Our initial pool included 1025 articles. After the screening of titles/abstracts, 63 articles were retained for full-text reviews. Evaluated based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 records met the review criteria. Of the 9 records, 1 was graded as very low, 3 low, and 5 low to moderate. The interventions for bereaved parents varied from using single-model interventions such as expressive arts therapy and telephone support to multimodal interventions that combined resources (ie, peer support, resource packets, and health-care support). Only 1 study explicitly illustrated how its bereavement intervention was designed based on the proposed theoretical model.
This review highlights the need for individualized, well-tested, and effective bereavement care interventions to support bereaved parents. In summary, the state of the science on interventions for bereaved parents is poor and much work needs to be done to effectively address the needs of bereaved parents, including both their physical and emotional health needs.
本系统文献综述旨在描述针对丧亲父母的干预措施,通过研究方法的严谨性、可重复性和理论基础来评估干预效果。
我们使用与研究目的相关的各种检索词和医学主题词,在通过PubMed(1966 - 2018年)检索的MEDLINE、CINAHL(1937年至今)、PsycINFO(1887年至今)和Embase(1947年至今)数据库中进行检索。对标题/摘要进行盲法筛选,通过小组讨论解决纳入决策冲突。为剩余文章创建矩阵并在团队中进行讨论。根据推荐分级评估、制定和评价指南,对9篇记录证据水平从极低到高进行评级。
我们最初的文献库包含1025篇文章。在筛选标题/摘要后,保留63篇文章进行全文审查。根据纳入/排除标准评估,9篇记录符合综述标准。在这9篇记录中,1篇证据水平评级为极低,3篇为低,5篇为低到中等。针对丧亲父母的干预措施各不相同,从使用单一模式干预如表达性艺术疗法和电话支持到结合多种资源(如同伴支持、资源包和医疗保健支持)的多模式干预。只有1项研究明确说明了其丧亲干预措施是如何基于所提出的理论模型设计的。
本综述强调需要个性化、经过充分测试且有效的丧亲护理干预措施来支持丧亲父母。总之,针对丧亲父母干预措施的科学现状不佳,需要做大量工作才能有效满足丧亲父母的需求,包括他们的身心健康需求。