Suppr超能文献

基于超高效液相色谱-离子淌度-四极杆飞行时间质谱的定量筛选和优先级排序作为一种替代的水样监测策略。

Quantitative screening and prioritization based on UPLC-IM-Q-TOF-MS as an alternative water sample monitoring strategy.

作者信息

Hinnenkamp Vanessa, Balsaa Peter, Schmidt Torsten C

机构信息

IWW Water Centre, Moritzstraße 26, 45476, Muelheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Instrumental Analytical Chemistry and Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitaetsstrasse 5, 45141, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Sep;411(23):6101-6110. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-01994-w. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Abstract

Suspect and non-target screening based on the use of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has become more common in water analysis over the past years. However, this only yields lists of features or suspects without quantitative information. To expand the use of HRMS data to a quantitative screening, we have developed and validated a simple and fast method for more than 140 micropollutants using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to traveling wave ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-IM-Q-TOF-MS). Positive findings from suspect and non-target screening can be prioritized and identified by reference standards. The quantitative screening is then performed by additional measurement of calibration standards. This is carried out by means of direct injection and external calibration, without consideration of matrix effects. For all substances, limits of quantification (LOQs) of less or equal than 100 ng/L are achieved. The calibration is carried out in a range of 100 to 1000 ng/L and the results are reported as concentration ranges, in which the concentration of the analyte in the sample is to be expected. All substances were evaluated using quadratic regressions. For the verification of the accuracy, different water matrices (drinking water, groundwater, and surface water) were spiked with five concentration levels (50 ng/L, 300 ng/L, 500 ng/L, 800 ng/L, and 2000 ng/L) and indicate that for the drinking water and groundwater sample, 97% correct assignments were found, whereas for the surface water sample, 88% correct assignments were achieved. A comparative study of water samples of various matrices was accomplished using the quantitative screening analysis method and validated target methods by means of three UPLC tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods and two gas chromatography (GC) coupled to MS and MS/MS methods. A total of 510 data could be compared, which showed a good match of both approaches in more than 80% of the results. As an alternative strategy for the monitoring of water samples by UPLC-IM-Q-TOF-MS, this method provides quantitative information about target components, besides tentatively or identified substances from suspect or non-target screening. Depending on the resulting concentration range and reporting requirements, validated target methods can be further used for the previously detected targets. Graphical abstract.

摘要

在过去几年中,基于高分辨率质谱(HRMS)的可疑物和非目标物筛查在水分析中变得越来越普遍。然而,这只能生成特征或可疑物列表,而没有定量信息。为了将HRMS数据的应用扩展到定量筛查,我们开发并验证了一种简单快速的方法,可使用超高效液相色谱与行波离子淌度四极杆飞行时间质谱(UPLC-IM-Q-TOF-MS)对140多种微污染物进行分析。可疑物和非目标物筛查的阳性结果可通过参考标准进行优先级排序和鉴定。然后通过对校准标准品的额外测量来进行定量筛查。这通过直接进样和外标法进行,不考虑基质效应。对于所有物质,实现了小于或等于100 ng/L的定量限(LOQ)。校准在100至1000 ng/L的范围内进行,结果以浓度范围报告,其中预期样品中分析物的浓度在该范围内。所有物质均使用二次回归进行评估。为了验证准确性,向不同的水基质(饮用水、地下水和地表水)中添加了五个浓度水平(50 ng/L、300 ng/L、500 ng/L、800 ng/L和2000 ng/L),结果表明,对于饮用水和地下水样品,正确赋值率为97%,而对于地表水样品,正确赋值率为88%。使用定量筛查分析方法对各种基质的水样进行了比较研究,并通过三种超高效液相色谱串联质谱(MS/MS)方法以及两种气相色谱(GC)与质谱和MS/MS联用方法对经过验证的目标方法进行了验证。总共可以比较510个数据,结果表明在超过80%的结果中,两种方法匹配良好。作为通过UPLC-IM-Q-TOF-MS监测水样的另一种策略,该方法除了提供来自可疑物或非目标物筛查的暂定或已鉴定物质外,还提供有关目标成分的定量信息。根据所得的浓度范围和报告要求,经过验证的目标方法可进一步用于先前检测到的目标物。图形摘要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验