Suppr超能文献

纯粹欺凌者和欺凌/受欺凌者的道德脱离:共同和独特的机制。

Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms.

机构信息

Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.

Centre for Emotional Health, C3A 731, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Sep;48(9):1835-1848. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

Abstract

The vast majority of adolescents recognize that bullying is morally wrong, yet bullying remains a problem in secondary schools, indicating young people may disengage from their moral values to engage in bullying. But it is unclear whether the same mechanisms enabling moral disengagement are active for bully/victims (who both bully and are bullied) as for pure bullies (who are not targets of bullying). This study tested the hypotheses that mechanisms of moral disengagement, including blaming the victim and minimizing the impact of bullying, may operate differently in bully/victims compared to pure bullies. From a sample of 1895 students from grades 7-9 (50.6% female; 83.4% from English speaking homes), 1870 provided self-reports on bullying involvement and mechanisms of moral disengagement associated with bullying. Two cut-offs were compared for bullying involvement (as perpetrator and as target of bullying) during the previous school term: a conservative cut-off (every few weeks or more often) and a liberal cut-off (once-or-twice). Using the conservative cut-off, both pure bullies and bully/victims enlisted moral disengagement mechanisms to justify bullying more than did uninvolved students and pure victims, with no significant difference in scores on any of the moral disengagement scales between pure bullies and bully/victims. For the liberal cut-off, bully/victims reported lower overall moral disengagement scores than did pure bullies, and specifically less distortion of consequences, diffusion of responsibility, and euphemistic labeling. This study advances bullying research by extending the role of moral disengagement in bullying episodes beyond pure bullies to victims, both pure victims and bully/victims. Examination of specific moral disengagement mechanisms and the extent of involvement in bullying enabled a more nuanced differentiation between the bullying groups. These results will inform future interventions aimed at reducing the use of moral disengagement mechanisms that sustain bullying and victimization. Targeted interventions are needed to challenge specific moral disengagement mechanisms from the perspectives of pure bullies and bully/victims.

摘要

绝大多数青少年都认识到欺凌是道德上错误的,但欺凌仍然是中学的一个问题,这表明年轻人可能会放弃自己的道德价值观来参与欺凌。但目前尚不清楚,使道德脱离的相同机制是否对欺凌者/受害者(既是欺凌者又是被欺凌者)和纯粹的欺凌者(不是欺凌的目标)都有效。本研究检验了以下假设:道德脱离的机制,包括指责受害者和淡化欺凌的影响,在欺凌者/受害者中可能与在纯粹的欺凌者中运作方式不同。从来自 7-9 年级的 1895 名学生(50.6%为女性;83.4%来自英语家庭)中,有 1870 名学生提供了与欺凌相关的欺凌参与和道德脱离机制的自我报告。对于前一学期的欺凌参与(作为施害者和作为欺凌的目标),比较了两种截止值:保守的截止值(每隔几周或更频繁)和宽松的截止值(一次或两次)。使用保守的截止值,无论是纯粹的欺凌者还是欺凌者/受害者,都利用道德脱离机制来为欺凌行为辩护,比未参与的学生和纯粹的受害者更频繁,在任何道德脱离量表上的得分都没有明显差异。对于宽松的截止值,欺凌者/受害者报告的总体道德脱离得分低于纯粹的欺凌者,特别是在歪曲后果、分散责任和委婉标签方面。本研究通过将道德脱离在欺凌事件中的作用从纯粹的欺凌者扩展到受害者,包括纯粹的受害者和欺凌者/受害者,从而推进了欺凌研究。对特定的道德脱离机制和参与欺凌的程度的考察,使我们能够更细致地区分欺凌群体。这些结果将为未来旨在减少维持欺凌和受害的道德脱离机制的使用的干预措施提供信息。需要有针对性的干预措施,从纯粹的欺凌者和欺凌者/受害者的角度来挑战特定的道德脱离机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验