Huang H J, Niu X H, Yang G L, Wang L Y, Shi F C, Xu S J, Xu L G, Li Y L
Department of Wound Repair, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450004, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 20;35(6):464-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.06.013.
To explore the clinical effects of antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. According to the treatment methods, 18 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (11 males and 7 females, aged 53-79 years), who were conformed to the study criteria and admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017, were enrolled in traditional group; 18 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (11 males and 7 females, aged 55-80 years), who were conformed to the study criteria and admitted to our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018, were enrolled in bone cement group. Wounds of patients in traditional group were treated with vacuum sealing drainage after conventional debridement. Wounds of patients in bone cement group were covered with antibiotic bone cement after conventional debridement. The number of patients with positive bacterial culture in wound exudate in the 2 groups on admission and 3, 6, 9, and 15 days after surgery, the length of hospital stay, the number of operation, and the wound complete healing time were retrospectively recorded. Data were processed with Fisher's exact probability test and independent sample test. Compared with (29±10) d and (4.6±1.2) times of patients in traditional group, the length of hospital stay [(9±3) d] of patients was obviously shortened, the number of operation [(1.3±0.6) times] of patients was obviously reduced, the number of patients with positive bacterial culture in wound exudate at each time point post surgery was obviously reduced (=8.177, 9.896, <0.05 or <0.01) in bone cement group. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of patients with positive bacterial culture in wound exudate on admission and wound complete healing time between patients in the 2 groups (=0.175, >0.05). The antibiotic bone cement treatment of diabetic foot ulcers can reduce the number of patients with positive bacterial culture in wound exudate and the number of operation, as well as shorten the length of hospital stay.
探讨抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病足溃疡的临床效果。根据治疗方法,将2016年1月至2017年1月符合研究标准并入住我院的18例糖尿病足溃疡患者(男11例,女7例,年龄53 - 79岁)纳入传统组;将2017年2月至2018年2月符合研究标准并入住我院的18例糖尿病足溃疡患者(男11例,女7例,年龄55 - 80岁)纳入骨水泥组。传统组患者伤口在常规清创后采用封闭式负压引流治疗。骨水泥组患者伤口在常规清创后覆盖抗生素骨水泥。回顾性记录两组患者入院时及术后3、6、9、15天伤口渗出液细菌培养阳性患者数量、住院时间、手术次数及伤口完全愈合时间。数据采用Fisher确切概率检验和独立样本检验进行处理。与传统组患者住院时间(29±10)天和手术次数(4.6±1.2)次相比,骨水泥组患者住院时间明显缩短[(9±3)天],手术次数明显减少[(1.3±0.6)次],术后各时间点伤口渗出液细菌培养阳性患者数量明显减少(=8.177,9.896,<0.05或<0.01)。两组患者入院时伤口渗出液细菌培养阳性患者数量及伤口完全愈合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(=0.175,>0.05)。抗生素骨水泥治疗糖尿病足溃疡可减少伤口渗出液细菌培养阳性患者数量及手术次数,缩短住院时间。