Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Six Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):852-861.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.039. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic screening reduces incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) because precursor lesions, such as conventional adenomas or serrated polyps, are removed. Individuals with polypectomies are advised to undergo colonoscopy surveillance to prevent CRC. However, guidelines for surveillance intervals after diagnosis of a precursor lesion, particularly for individuals with serrated polyps, vary widely, and lack sufficient supporting evidence. Consequently, some high-risk patients do not receive enough surveillance and lower-risk subjects receive excessive surveillance.
We examined the association between findings from first endoscopy and CRC risk among 122,899 participants who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the Nurses' Health Study 1 (1990-2012), Nurses' Health Study 2 (1989-2013), or the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1990-2012). Endoscopic findings were categorized as no polyp, conventional adenoma, or serrated polyp (hyperplastic polyp, traditional serrated adenoma, or sessile serrated adenoma, with or without cytological dysplasia). Conventional adenomas were classified as advanced (≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, or tubulovillous or villous histology) or nonadvanced, and serrated polyps were assigned to categories of large (≥10 mm) or small (<10 mm). We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of CRC incidence, after adjusting for various potential risk factors.
After a median follow-up period of 10 years, we documented 491 incident cases of CRC: 51 occurred in 6161 participants with conventional adenomas, 24 in 5918 participants with serrated polyps, and 427 in 112,107 participants with no polyp. Compared with participants with no polyp detected during initial endoscopy, the multivariable HR for incident CRC in individuals with an advanced adenoma was 4.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.89-5.72) and the HR for CRC in individuals with a large serrated polyp was 3.35 (95% CI 1.37-8.15). In contrast, there was no significant increase in risk of CRC in patients with nonadvanced adenomas (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.68-2.16, P = .52) or small serrated polyps (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.76-2.08; P = .38).
These findings provide support for guidelines that recommend repeat lower endoscopy within 3 years of a diagnosis of advanced adenoma and large serrated polyps. In contrast, patients with nonadvanced adenoma or small serrated polyps may not require more intensive surveillance than patients without polyps.
内镜筛查可降低结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率,因为可以切除癌前病变,如传统腺瘤或锯齿状息肉。建议接受息肉切除术的患者进行结肠镜检查以预防 CRC。然而,对于诊断出的癌前病变,特别是锯齿状息肉患者,监测间隔的指南差异很大,缺乏足够的支持证据。因此,一些高危患者未接受足够的监测,而低危患者则接受了过度的监测。
我们检查了在参加护士健康研究 1 期(1990-2012 年)、护士健康研究 2 期(1989-2013 年)或健康专业人员随访研究(1990-2012 年)的 122899 名参与者中,首次内镜检查结果与 CRC 风险之间的关系。内镜检查结果分为无息肉、传统腺瘤或锯齿状息肉(增生性息肉、传统锯齿状腺瘤或无细胞学异型增生的平坦锯齿状腺瘤)。传统腺瘤分为高级别(≥10mm、高级别异型增生、管状绒毛状或绒毛状组织学)或非高级别,锯齿状息肉分为大型(≥10mm)或小型(<10mm)。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算了各种潜在风险因素调整后的 CRC 发病率的风险比(HR)。
在中位随访 10 年后,我们记录了 491 例 CRC 病例:6161 名参与者中有 51 例发生在有传统腺瘤的患者中,5918 名参与者中有 24 例发生在有锯齿状息肉的患者中,112107 名无息肉的患者中有 427 例发生。与初始内镜检查时未发现息肉的参与者相比,高级别腺瘤患者的 CRC 发病 HR 为 4.07(95%置信区间 [CI] 2.89-5.72),大型锯齿状息肉患者的 CRC HR 为 3.35(95% CI 1.37-8.15)。相比之下,非高级别腺瘤患者(HR 1.21;95% CI 0.68-2.16,P=0.52)或小型锯齿状息肉患者(HR 1.25;95% CI 0.76-2.08;P=0.38)CRC 风险无显著增加。
这些发现为指南提供了支持,建议在诊断高级别腺瘤和大型锯齿状息肉后 3 年内进行再次结肠镜检查。相比之下,非高级别腺瘤或小型锯齿状息肉患者可能不需要比无息肉患者更密集的监测。