Kim Paul J, Attinger Christopher E, Orgill Dennis, Galiano Robert D, Steinberg John S, Evans Karen K, Lavery Lawrence A
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e2129. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002129. eCollection 2019 Apr.
The complex diabetic lower extremity wound has not been well studied. There are a variety of new technologies now being applied with a paucity of evidence in evaluating their outcomes. The aim of this study is to describe clinical outcomes in the complex lower extremity wound in the comorbid host. We hypothesized that treatment choice would have minimal impact on healing outcomes in this compromised population.
A multicenter retrospective registry of patients with diabetes and lower extremity wounds was created to compare treatment modalities of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold, negative-pressure wound therapy, local tissue flap, and free tissue transfer. Statistical analyses included descriptive, proportional comparisons and Cox regression.
There were no statistical differences in age, hemoglobin A1c, or body mass index between groups. Study patients had a history of amputation (40.5%), peripheral vascular disease (54.6%), peripheral neuropathy (64.8%), end-stage renal disease (13.9%), renal/hepatic disease (40.4%), and hypertension (85%). The most common wound etiologies were surgical dehiscence (69%), diabetic neuropathic wounds (39%), and ischemic wounds (28%), most commonly located on the foot or at a prior amputation site (30%). Mean wound area was 57.9 cm and almost half with exposed bone. There were no statistical differences between treatment groups in proportion or time to healing, recurrence, or time to return to baseline function.
Commonly used treatment modalities employed for this population of patients resulted in similar outcomes. This is the first study to describe the complex diabetic lower extremity wound in a complex host.
复杂的糖尿病下肢伤口尚未得到充分研究。目前有多种新技术正在应用,但在评估其效果方面证据不足。本研究的目的是描述合并症患者复杂下肢伤口的临床结果。我们假设在这个受损人群中,治疗选择对愈合结果的影响最小。
建立了一个多中心糖尿病和下肢伤口患者回顾性登记系统,以比较胶原-糖胺聚糖支架、负压伤口治疗、局部组织瓣和游离组织移植的治疗方式。统计分析包括描述性分析、比例比较和Cox回归。
各组之间在年龄、糖化血红蛋白或体重指数方面无统计学差异。研究患者有截肢史(40.5%)、外周血管疾病史(54.6%)、外周神经病变史(64.8%)、终末期肾病史(13.9%)、肾/肝病史(40.4%)和高血压史(85%)。最常见的伤口病因是手术切口裂开(69%)、糖尿病神经病变性伤口(39%)和缺血性伤口(28%),最常见于足部或既往截肢部位(30%)。平均伤口面积为57.9平方厘米,近一半有骨质外露。治疗组在愈合比例、愈合时间、复发率或恢复至基线功能的时间方面无统计学差异。
用于这类患者的常用治疗方式产生了相似的结果。这是第一项描述复杂宿主中复杂糖尿病下肢伤口的研究。