Vyriad Inc., 3605 US Highway 52 N, Building 110, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
BioDrugs. 2019 Oct;33(5):485-501. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00367-0.
New immuno-oncology therapies are improving cancer treatments beyond the former standard of care, as evidenced by the recent and continuing clinical approvals for immunotherapies in a broad range of indications. However, a majority of patients (particularly those with immunologically cold tumors) still do not benefit, highlighting the need for rational combination approaches. Oncolytic viruses (OV) both directly kill tumor cells and inflame the tumor microenvironment. While OV spread can be limited by the generation of antiviral immune responses, the initial local tumor cell killing can reverse the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, resulting in more effective release of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), cross-presentation, and antitumoral effector T cell recruitment. Moreover, many OVs can be engineered to express immunomodulatory genes. Rational combination approaches to cancer immunotherapy include the use of OVs in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) to promote sustained antitumoral immune responses. OV combinations have additive or synergistic efficacy in preclinical tumor models with ICIs or ACT. Several preclinical studies have confirmed systemic reactivation and proliferation of adoptively transferred antitumoral T cells in conjunction with oncolytic OVs (expressing cytokines or TAAs) resulting from the specific tumor cell killing and immunostimulation of the tumor microenvironment which leads to increased tumor trafficking, activity, and survival. Recent clinical trials combining OVs with ICIs have shown additive effects in melanoma. Additional clinical data in an expanded range of patient indications are eagerly awaited. The relative timings of OV and ICI combination remains under-studied and is an area for continued exploration. Studies systematically exploring the effects of systemic ICIs prior to, concomitantly with, or following OV therapy will aid in the future design of clinical trials to enhance efficacy and increase patient response rates.
新的免疫肿瘤疗法正在改善癌症治疗,超越了以前的标准治疗,这一点可以从最近和持续的免疫疗法在广泛的适应症中的临床批准中得到证明。然而,大多数患者(特别是那些免疫冷肿瘤患者)仍然没有受益,这突出了需要合理的联合治疗方法。溶瘤病毒(OV)既能直接杀死肿瘤细胞,又能引发肿瘤微环境炎症。尽管抗病毒免疫反应会限制 OV 的传播,但最初的局部肿瘤细胞杀伤可以逆转免疫抑制的肿瘤微环境,导致更有效的肿瘤相关抗原(TAA)释放、交叉呈递和抗肿瘤效应 T 细胞募集。此外,许多 OV 可以被设计来表达免疫调节基因。癌症免疫治疗的合理联合治疗方法包括将 OV 与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)或过继性 T 细胞疗法(ACT)联合使用,以促进持续的抗肿瘤免疫反应。OV 联合在 ICI 或 ACT 的临床前肿瘤模型中具有相加或协同疗效。几项临床前研究证实,与表达细胞因子或 TAA 的溶瘤 OV 联合使用时,过继转移的抗肿瘤 T 细胞在体内会被重新激活和增殖,这是由于肿瘤微环境中的特定肿瘤细胞杀伤和免疫刺激导致肿瘤转移、活性和存活增加。最近的临床试验表明,OV 与 ICI 联合使用在黑色素瘤中有相加作用。在更广泛的患者适应证范围内,正在等待更多的临床数据。OV 和 ICI 联合的相对时机仍在研究中,这是一个需要继续探索的领域。系统地研究全身性 ICI 在 OV 治疗之前、同时或之后的影响,将有助于未来设计临床试验,以提高疗效和增加患者的反应率。