Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Free Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Free Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin Protonen am Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;208:289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
To compare intravitreal therapy with the natural course of radiation optic neuropathy after primary proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma with respect to long-term visual acuity and development of optic atrophy.
Retrospective comparative case series.
Inclusion criteria: patients treated with primary proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma with a minimum follow-up of 24 months after the occurrence of radiation optic neuropathy and optic disc imaging during follow-up.
pathologic condition of the optic disc before irradiation and intravitreal therapy to treat cystoid macular edema not originating from the optic disc.
Of 93 patients, 48 were observed only after radiation optic neuropathy, and 45 were treated with intravitreal therapy (triamcinolone, bevacizumab, and/or dexamethasone). Median follow-up was 55 months (29-187 months); median interval between onset of radiation optic neuropathy and the last patient visit was 34 months (24-125 months). Of 48 observed patients, 41 (85.4%) developed an optic atrophy after a median of 14 months (3-86 months) after radiation optic neuropathy; and of 45 intravitreally treated patients, 34 (75.5%) presented with an optic atrophy after a median of 12.5 months (1-55 months) following optic neuropathy, indicating no statistically significant differences between the groups. Comparing the change in visual acuity from occurrence of optic neuropathy to final visual acuity, no statistically significant differences were found between either group (P = 0.579).
Patients treated with intravitreal therapy for radiation optic neuropathy showed no statistically significant differences related to visual acuity or optic atrophy development from patients who underwent only observation.
比较原发性质子束治疗脉络膜黑色素瘤后放射性视神经病变的自然病程与玻璃体内治疗,以评估长期视力和视神经萎缩的发展情况。
回顾性对比病例系列。
纳入标准:接受原发性质子束治疗脉络膜黑色素瘤的患者,放射性视神经病变发生后至少随访 24 个月,且在随访过程中存在视盘成像。
照射前视盘病变和玻璃体内治疗治疗非源于视盘的囊样黄斑水肿。
93 例患者中,48 例仅在放射性视神经病变后进行观察,45 例接受玻璃体内治疗(曲安奈德、贝伐单抗和/或地塞米松)。中位随访时间为 55 个月(29-187 个月);放射性视神经病变发病至末次就诊的中位间隔时间为 34 个月(24-125 个月)。在 48 例观察患者中,41 例(85.4%)在放射性视神经病变后 14 个月(3-86 个月)中位时间发展为视神经萎缩;在 45 例玻璃体内治疗患者中,34 例(75.5%)在视神经病变后 12.5 个月(1-55 个月)中位时间出现视神经萎缩,两组间无统计学显著差异。比较从发生视神经病变到最终视力的视力变化,两组间无统计学显著差异(P=0.579)。
接受玻璃体内治疗放射性视神经病变的患者与仅接受观察的患者相比,在视力或视神经萎缩发展方面无统计学显著差异。