Werner Brian C, Gulotta Lawrence V, Dines Joshua S, Dines David M, Warren Russell F, Craig Edward V, Taylor Samuel A
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, 400 Ray C. Hunt Drive, Suite 330, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA.
2Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA.
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9653-1. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
The effect of a pre-operative compromised acromion on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not well-studied.
PURPOSES/QUESTIONS: We sought to determine the effect of a pre-operative compromised acromion on outcomes following RSA.
We conducted a retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients who underwent RSA over a 6-year period (June 2007 to June 2013) with a diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Pre-operative plain radiographs were examined to determine the presence of acromion compromise ( = 11). Acromion compromise was defined as (1) less than 25% of the normal acromion thickness (8.8 mm), (2) less than 50% of the normal acromion anteroposterior width (46.1 mm), (3) presence of an os acromiale, or (4) presence of acromial fragmentation. An age- and sex-matched control cohort without acromial compromise was also identified ( = 33). The primary outcome variable was the final minimum 2-year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Secondary outcomes included final minimum 2-year scores on the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), with the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS); 2-year Marx shoulder activity scale scores; and final 2-year satisfaction scores.
At 2 years post-operatively, there were no significant differences in final scores using ASES, SF-12 PCS or MCS, or Marx shoulder activity scale. There were no significant differences between groups for satisfaction scores in any of the assessed domains. No complications were reported at 2 years' follow-up in any of the study patients or controls.
Between patients with and without pre-operative acromion compromise, there were no differences in clinical outcomes, satisfaction levels, or complication rates after RSA. Our findings suggest that surgeons performing RSA in the setting of pre-operative acromion compromise, including os acromiale, acromial fragmentation, or severe thinning, should not expect poor post-operative clinical outcomes.
术前肩峰受损对反式肩关节置换术(RSA)的影响尚未得到充分研究。
目的/问题:我们试图确定术前肩峰受损对RSA术后结果的影响。
我们对2007年6月至2013年6月期间连续接受RSA且诊断为肩袖撕裂性关节病的患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。检查术前X线平片以确定肩峰受损情况(n = 11)。肩峰受损定义为:(1)小于正常肩峰厚度(8.8毫米)的25%;(2)小于正常肩峰前后径宽度(46.1毫米)的50%;(3)存在肩峰骨;或(4)存在肩峰碎裂。还确定了一个年龄和性别匹配的无肩峰受损的对照队列(n = 33)。主要结局变量是最终至少2年的美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分。次要结局包括12项简短健康调查(SF - 12)的最终至少2年评分,包括身体成分评分(PCS)和精神成分评分(MCS);2年马克思肩部活动量表评分;以及最终2年的满意度评分。
术后2年,使用ASES、SF - 12 PCS或MCS以及马克思肩部活动量表的最终评分无显著差异。在任何评估领域,两组之间的满意度评分均无显著差异。在任何研究患者或对照的2年随访中均未报告并发症。
术前有肩峰受损和无肩峰受损的患者之间,RSA术后的临床结果、满意度水平或并发症发生率没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,在术前肩峰受损(包括肩峰骨、肩峰碎裂或严重变薄)的情况下进行RSA的外科医生,不应预期术后临床结果不佳。