Suppr超能文献

医疗寄养家庭比传统的养老院护理费用更低。

Medical foster home is less costly than traditional nursing home care.

机构信息

Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation at the Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):1346-1356. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13195. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs of Community Nursing Homes (CNHs) to Medical Foster Homes (MFHs) at Veteran Health Administration (VHA) Medical Centers that established MFH programs.

DATA SOURCES

Episode and costs data were derived from VA and Medicare files (inpatient, outpatient, emergency room, skilled nursing facility, dialysis, and hospice).

STUDY DESIGN

Propensity scores matched 354 MFH to 1693 CNH Veterans on demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, and costs.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Data were retrieved for years 2010-2011 from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, VA Health Data Repository, and the VA MFH Program through the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After matching on unique characteristics of MFH Veterans, costs were $71.28 less per day alive compared to CNH care. Home-based and mental health care costs increased with savings largely attributable to avoiding CNH residential care. When average out-of-pocket payments by Veterans of $74/day are considered, MFH is at least cost neutral. Mortality was 12 percent higher among matched Veterans in CNHs.

CONCLUSIONS

MFHs may serve as alternatives to traditional CNH care that do not increase total costs with mortality benefits. Future work should examine the differences for functional disability subgroups.

摘要

目的

比较退伍军人健康管理局(VA)医疗中心设立医疗寄养之家(MFH)项目的社区疗养院(CNH)和医疗寄养之家(MFH)的成本。

数据来源

病例和成本数据来自 VA 和 Medicare 文件(住院、门诊、急诊室、熟练护理设施、透析和临终关怀)。

研究设计

采用倾向评分匹配了 354 名 MFH 退伍军人和 1693 名 CNH 退伍军人的人口统计学、临床特征、医疗保健利用情况和成本。

数据提取方法

从 VA 公司数据仓库、VA 健康数据存储库和 VA 通过 VA 信息学和计算基础设施(VINCI)的 MFH 计划中检索了 2010-2011 年的数据。

主要发现

在对 MFH 退伍军人的独特特征进行匹配后,与 CNH 护理相比,每天的存活成本降低了 71.28 美元。家庭和心理健康护理费用增加,节省的费用主要归因于避免了 CNH 住宿护理。当考虑到退伍军人每天 74 美元的平均自付费用时,MFH 至少是成本中性的。在 CNH 中,匹配的退伍军人的死亡率高出 12%。

结论

MFH 可以作为传统 CNH 护理的替代方案,而不会因死亡率的提高而增加总成本。未来的工作应该研究功能障碍亚组的差异。

相似文献

1
Medical foster home is less costly than traditional nursing home care.医疗寄养家庭比传统的养老院护理费用更低。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):1346-1356. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13195. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验