Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220202. eCollection 2019.
The efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis has been established at long-term follow-up with the majority of recurrences shown to occur within the first year. Overall costs of antibiotics are significantly lower compared with appendectomy at short-term follow-up, but long-term durability of these cost savings is unclear. The study objective was to compare the long-term overall costs of antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC (APPendicitis ACuta) trial at 5 years.
This multicentre, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial randomly assigned 530 adult patients with CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis to appendectomy or antibiotic treatment at six Finnish hospitals. All major costs during the 5-year follow-up were recorded, whether generated by the initial visit and subsequent treatment or possible recurrent appendicitis. Between November 2009 and June 2012, 273 patients were randomized to appendectomy and 257 to antibiotics. The overall costs of appendectomy were 1.4 times higher (p<0.001) (€5716; 95% CI: €5510 to €5925) compared with antibiotic therapy (€4171; 95% CI: €3879 to €4463) resulting in cost savings of €1545 per patient (95% CI: €1193 to €1899; p<0.001) in the antibiotic group. At 5 years, the majority (61%, n = 156) of antibiotic group patients did not undergo appendectomy.
At 5-year follow-up antibiotic treatment resulted in significantly lower overall costs compared with appendectomy. As the majority of appendicitis recurrences occur within the first year after the initial antibiotic treatment, these results suggest that treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis with antibiotics instead of appendectomy results in lower overall costs even at longer-term follow-up.
长期随访显示,抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效和安全性得到了证实,大多数复发发生在最初的一年内。与短期随访相比,抗生素治疗的总体成本明显低于阑尾切除术,但这些成本节约的长期耐久性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在 APPAC(急性阑尾炎 ACuta)试验中比较 5 年时抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的长期总体成本。
这项多中心、非劣效性随机临床试验将 530 名经 CT 证实患有单纯性急性阑尾炎的成年患者随机分配至六家芬兰医院接受阑尾切除术或抗生素治疗。在 5 年的随访期间,记录了所有主要费用,无论是由初始就诊和随后的治疗还是可能的复发性阑尾炎产生的。2009 年 11 月至 2012 年 6 月,273 名患者被随机分配至阑尾切除术组,257 名患者被随机分配至抗生素治疗组。与抗生素治疗相比,阑尾切除术的总体成本高 1.4 倍(p<0.001)(€5716;95%CI:€5510 至 €5925),导致抗生素治疗组每位患者节省 1545 欧元(95%CI:€1193 至 €1899;p<0.001)。在 5 年时,抗生素组的大多数(61%,n=156)患者未接受阑尾切除术。
在 5 年随访时,抗生素治疗的总体成本明显低于阑尾切除术。由于大多数阑尾炎复发发生在最初的抗生素治疗后 1 年内,这些结果表明,用抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎而不是阑尾切除术,即使在长期随访中,也会导致总体成本降低。