Suppr超能文献

肾移植排斥反应的病理特征及移植肾结局差异

Differences in Pathologic Features and Graft Outcomes of Rejection on Kidney Transplant.

作者信息

Park Woo Yeong, Paek Jin Hyuk, Jin Kyubok, Park Sung Bae, Choe Misun, Han Seungyeup

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea; Keimyung University Kidney Institute, Daegu, Korea.

Keimyung University Kidney Institute, Daegu, Korea; Department of Pathology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2019 Oct;51(8):2655-2659. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.062. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rejection is still a barrier to long-term allograft survival, but there are not many reports of clinical outcomes according to rejection types. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in pathologic features and graft outcomes of rejection on kidney transplant (KT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 139 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed to rejection by allograft biopsy results between 2006 and 2018. We divided kidney transplant recipients into 3 groups as follows: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection, and mixed rejection. We investigated clinical characteristics, pathologic findings, death-censored graft survival rates, and patient survival rates among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 113.5 (SD, 80.6) months. The mixed rejection group was the youngest significantly. There were no significant differences of the proportion of sex, KT type, KT number, number of HLA mismatches, induction immunosuppressant, and maintenance immunosuppressant among the 3 groups. In pathologic findings, microvascular inflammation and C4d were significantly different among the 3 groups. Death-censored graft survival of mixed rejection was the least. In multivariate analysis, recipient age, TCMR, and positive C4d were the risk factors associated with graft failure. However, patient survival rates showed no significant differences among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that mixed rejection had poor prognosis in comparison with TCMR and antibody-mediated rejection groups, and TCMR and positive C4d were the most important risk factors for graft survival. Therefore, constant monitoring through allograft biopsy and early treatment for rejection are very important in post-transplant clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

排斥反应仍是同种异体移植长期存活的障碍,但根据排斥反应类型的临床结果报告并不多。本研究的目的是调查肾移植(KT)排斥反应的病理特征和移植结果的差异。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2006年至2018年间通过同种异体移植活检结果诊断为排斥反应的139例肾移植受者。我们将肾移植受者分为以下3组:T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)、抗体介导的排斥反应和混合性排斥反应。我们调查了3组患者的临床特征、病理结果、死亡截尾移植存活率和患者存活率。

结果

平均随访时间为113.5(标准差,80.6)个月。混合性排斥反应组明显最年轻。3组之间在性别比例、KT类型、KT次数、HLA错配数、诱导免疫抑制剂和维持免疫抑制剂方面无显著差异。在病理结果方面,3组之间微血管炎症和C4d有显著差异。混合性排斥反应的死亡截尾移植存活率最低。在多变量分析中,受者年龄、TCMR和C4d阳性是与移植失败相关的危险因素。然而,3组之间的患者存活率无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,与TCMR组和抗体介导的排斥反应组相比,混合性排斥反应预后较差,TCMR和C4d阳性是移植存活的最重要危险因素。因此,通过同种异体移植活检进行持续监测和对排斥反应进行早期治疗对移植后临床结果非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验