Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Sep 1;317(3):H627-H639. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00327.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
The exercise consisted of: ) a short survey to acquire baseline data on current practices regarding the conduct of animal studies, ) a series of presentations for promoting awareness and providing advice and practical tools for improving experimental design, and ) a follow-up survey 12 mo later to assess whether practices had changed. The surveys were compulsory for responsible investigators ( = 16; paired data presented). Other investigators named on animal ethics applications were encouraged to participate (2017, total of 36 investigators; 2018, 37 investigators). The major findings to come from the exercise included ) a willingness of investigators to make changes when provided with knowledge/tools and solutions that were relatively simple to implement (e.g., proportion of responsible investigators showing improved practices using a structured method for randomization was 0.44, 95% CI (0.19; 0.70), = 0.003, and deidentifying drugs/interventions was 0.40, 95% CI (0.12; 0.68), = 0.010); ) resistance to change if this involved more personnel and time (e.g., as required for allocation concealment); and ) evidence that changes to long-term practices ("habits") require time and follow-up. Improved practices could be verified based on changes in reporting within publications or documented evidence provided during laboratory visits. In summary, this exercise resulted in changed attitudes, practices, and reporting, but continued follow-up, monitoring, and incentives are required. Efforts to improve experimental rigor will reduce bias and will lead to findings with the greatest translational potential. The goal of this exercise was to encourage preclinical researchers to improve the quality of their cardiac and metabolic animal studies by ) increasing awareness of concerns, which can arise from suboptimal experimental designs; ) providing knowledge, tools, and templates to overcome bias; and ) conducting two short surveys over 12 mo to monitor change. Improved practices were identified for the uptake of structured methods for randomization, and de-identifying interventions/drugs.Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/experimental-design-survey-training-practical-tools/.
)进行一项简短的调查,以获取当前进行动物研究的实践的基线数据,)进行一系列演讲,以提高认识,并提供改进实验设计的建议和实用工具,)以及 12 个月后进行后续调查,以评估实践是否发生变化。该调查对负责的研究人员是强制性的(= 16;配对数据呈现)。鼓励动物伦理申请中列出的其他研究人员参与(2017 年,共有 36 名调查人员;2018 年,37 名调查人员)。该研究的主要发现包括:)当提供相对简单实施的知识/工具和解决方案时,研究人员愿意进行更改(例如,使用随机分组的结构化方法显示改进实践的负责研究人员的比例为 0.44,95%CI(0.19;0.70),= 0.003,以及药物/干预措施的去识别率为 0.40,95%CI(0.12;0.68),= 0.010);)如果这涉及更多人员和时间(例如,需要隐匿分配),则会抵制更改;)有证据表明,长期实践(“习惯”)的改变需要时间和后续行动。可以根据出版物中的报告变化或实验室访问期间提供的记录证据来验证改进的实践。总之,该研究结果表明,研究人员的态度、实践和报告发生了变化,但需要持续进行后续、监测和激励。努力提高实验严谨性将减少偏倚,并将产生最具转化潜力的研究结果。该研究的目的是通过以下方式鼓励临床前研究人员提高其心脏和代谢动物研究的质量:)提高对可能因实验设计不合理而产生的问题的认识;)提供克服偏倚的知识、工具和模板;)在 12 个月内进行两次简短调查以监测变化。研究确定了采用结构化随机化方法和识别药物/干预措施的改进措施。点击此处收听本文的播客:https://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/experimental-design-survey-training-practical-tools/。