University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Maturitas. 2019 Sep;127:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
This review considers how research into the impact of music on people with dementia has been conducted, with a focus on the means used to measure outcomes. Although there is a rapidly growing amount of research in this relatively new area, it has evolved largely independently within different fields, such as psychology, music therapy and nursing. Using principles from the meta-narrative review method, this paper systematically surveys the qualitative and quantitative measures which have been used in studies relating to music and dementia from 1980 to the present day. Data extracted include the outcome measures used, the type of musical interventions, the setting of the studies, and methodology and study design. The quantitative studies greatly outnumber the qualitative studies, and most research has been done in long-term care settings. Instruments which measure neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia, especially agitation, were the most frequently used. Other domains that were targeted in the studies included quality of life, physiological change, music-related outcomes and cognitive skills; the inter-relations between these domains are represented as a diagram. Researchers' rationales for choosing to target these outcomes are discussed. Although reduction of neuropsychiatric symptoms is a valuable outcome, it is important that researchers are open to the possibility of other outcomes. We suggest that measuring an increase in positive responses might be an alternative to measuring a reduction of negative symptoms, and we highlight the importance of listening to people with dementia and carers when designing studies.
这篇综述探讨了音乐对痴呆症患者影响的研究方法,重点关注用于衡量研究结果的手段。尽管在这个相对较新的领域中,研究数量迅速增加,但它主要在心理学、音乐治疗和护理等不同领域中独立发展。本文运用元叙述性综述方法的原理,系统地调查了自 1980 年至今与音乐和痴呆症相关的研究中所使用的定性和定量测量方法。提取的数据包括所使用的评估方法、音乐干预的类型、研究地点以及方法学和研究设计。定量研究的数量远远超过定性研究,并且大多数研究都是在长期护理环境中进行的。用于测量痴呆症患者神经精神症状(尤其是躁动)的仪器是最常用的。研究中还针对其他领域进行了研究,包括生活质量、生理变化、与音乐相关的结果和认知技能;这些领域之间的相互关系用图表表示。研究者选择针对这些结果的理由进行了讨论。尽管减轻神经精神症状是一个有价值的结果,但研究人员应该对其他结果持开放态度。我们建议,衡量积极反应的增加可能是衡量负面症状减少的替代方法,并且我们强调在设计研究时倾听痴呆症患者和护理人员的意见的重要性。