Suppr超能文献

基于教育的干预对中国农村 2 型糖尿病患者的影响差异。

Differential Impact of an Education-Based Intervention for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Rural China.

机构信息

Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171-77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Public Health Services, Karolinska Institutet, 171-77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152676.

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the impact of an education-based intervention to improve vertical integration and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in rural China. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in three townships in Jingjiang county, Jiangsu Province were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. Participants in the intervention group received an education-based intervention. Patients' data including the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and sociodemographic characteristics were collected at baseline (2015) and follow-up (2016). The FBG levels decreased significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group in the overall analysis. In the stratified analysis, FBG levels and some aspects of HRQoL improved in the intervention group more for females, married persons, those with low education, and those in farming or house working. Participants in the control group deteriorated in FBG levels but improved in some aspects of HRQoL. The intervention improved in FBG levels and some aspects of HRQoL among participants. Furthermore, the intervention seemed to differentially benefit females, married persons, lowly educated persons, and those in farming or house working more than other groups. (Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN13319989. Retrospectively registered 4 April 2017).

摘要

本研究旨在评估基于教育的干预措施对改善中国农村基层医疗中 2 型糖尿病垂直整合和管理的影响。江苏省靖江市三个乡镇的 2 型糖尿病患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组患者接受基于教育的干预。在基线(2015 年)和随访(2016 年)时收集患者的数据,包括空腹血糖(FBG)水平、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和社会人口统计学特征。总体分析显示,干预组的 FBG 水平明显低于对照组。分层分析显示,对于女性、已婚人士、受教育程度较低和从事农业或家务劳动的人群,干预组的 FBG 水平和某些方面的 HRQoL 有所改善。对照组患者的 FBG 水平恶化,但某些方面的 HRQoL 有所改善。干预措施改善了参与者的 FBG 水平和某些方面的 HRQoL。此外,干预措施似乎对女性、已婚人士、受教育程度较低和从事农业或家务劳动的人群的益处大于其他人群。(试验注册:ISRCTN,ISRCTN81021312。2017 年 4 月 4 日回顾性注册)。

相似文献

1
Differential Impact of an Education-Based Intervention for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Rural China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152676.
7
Design and implementation of an Omaha System-based integrated nursing management model for patients with newly-diagnosed diabetes.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Outcome of focused pre-Ramadan education on metabolic and glycaemic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 Sep;12(5):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.036. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Development and evaluation of a patient-oriented education system for diabetes management.
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Sep;76(9):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.030. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
10
[Effectiveness of systematic self-management education on blood sugar level of patients in the community with type 2 diabetes].
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Apr;37(4):355-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.04.006.

引用本文的文献

3
Interventions to improve primary healthcare in rural settings: A scoping review.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0305516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305516. eCollection 2024.
4
Effects of patient education on the quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.
Malays Fam Physician. 2022 Nov 25;17(3):22-32. doi: 10.51866/rv.208. eCollection 2022 Nov 30.
6
Application of the EQ-5D in the Middle East: A Systematic Review Focusing on Patients Living in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 May 12;14:1101-1106. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S306703. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Realigning the incentive system for China's primary healthcare providers.
BMJ. 2019 Jun 21;365:l2406. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2406.
5
The primary health-care system in China.
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2584-2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
Socioeconomic disparities in type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence and self-management behaviors in rural southwest China.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;121:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.07.032. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among inland residents in China (2000-2014): A meta-analysis.
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Nov;7(6):845-852. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12514. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验