School of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
Schoolf of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 31;9(7):e027895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895.
We used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors.
A cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015.
Our final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China.
The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults.
More than three-fourths (78%) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74% of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95% CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries.
We found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.
我们利用中国和美国具有代表性的老年人群体样本,调查了以下两个问题:(1)影响中国老年人自评健康的因素是否与影响美国老年人自评健康的因素相似;(2)在控制了可用的影响因素后,中国和美国老年人的自评健康是否存在显著的跨国差异。
这是一项横断面研究。数据来自于 2014 年进行的美国健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study)和 2014 年至 2015 年开展的中国健康与退休纵向研究(China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study)。
我们的最终样本包括美国的 8905 名老年人和中国的 4442 名老年人。
因变量是自评健康。采用有序逻辑回归模型来研究影响老年人自评健康的因素。
超过四分之三(78%)的中国老年人报告健康状况较差,而近 74%的美国老年人报告健康状况极佳、非常好或好。在总体有序逻辑回归模型中,在统计学上控制了社会人口统计学、家庭结构、功能限制、认知、慢性疾病、心理健康和与健康相关的行为因素后,中国调查对象更有可能将自己的健康状况评为较差,而美国调查对象则更有可能评为较好。与中国老年人相比,美国老年人健康状况较好的可能性几乎高出五倍(OR=4.88,95%CI 4.06 至 5.86)。与与配偶/伴侣同住的老年人相比,独居的中国老年人对自己的健康状况评价更好;然而,这两种居住安排在美国老年人中没有显著差异。相比之下,与配偶/伴侣同住的美国老年人对自己的健康状况评价更差。此外,在中国和美国,日常生活活动受限较多、自我报告记忆较差、心理健康状况较差和患有慢性疾病的老年人自评健康状况较差。
即使在控制了疾病、功能状态和其他影响因素的情况下,我们仍发现中国和美国老年人的自评健康状况存在显著差异。与美国老年人相比,中国老年人更有可能报告较差的健康状况。