Özlek Esin, Neelakantan Prasanna, Matinlinna Jukka Pekka, Belli Sema, Ugur Mehmet, Kavut Idrıs
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Van Yuzuncu Yil, Van 65090, Turkey.
Discipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;7(3):80. doi: 10.3390/dj7030080.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of two new fiber post systems (FiberSite™ Post and Cytec™ Blanco Post) cemented with two different adhesive resin cements (Panavia™ SA and Maxcem™ Elite). Root canals of sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared using ProTaper Universal™ rotary files (Dentsply Sirona Endodontics, York, PA, USA). The root canals were irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) during instrumentation. After root canal preparation, the canals were irrigated with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (1 min), followed by 2 mL of 5.25% (5 min) NaOCI, and 2 mL saline. The root canals were dried with paper points and divided randomly into two study groups ( = 30) according to the type of post system: Group 1, FiberSite™ Post (MegaDental, Partanna, Italy); and group 2, Cytec™ Blanco Post (Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany), with one of the two adhesive resin cements: Subgroup A, Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); subgroup B, Maxcem™ Elite (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Following thermocycling, the adhesion strength was evaluated using the push-out adhesion (bond) strength test. Fractographic analysis was performed using stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance ( = 0.05). The adhesion strength values of both the posts were significantly higher when cemented with subgroup B (Maxcem™ Elite). The highest adhesion strength value was demonstrated by group 1B (FiberSite™ post cemented with Maxcem™ Elite cement). The type of post did not have a significant impact on the bond strength values for either cement material.
本体外研究的目的是评估两种新型纤维桩系统(FiberSite™桩和Cytec™ Blanco桩)与两种不同的粘结树脂水门汀(Panavia™ SA和Maxcem™ Elite)粘结后的粘结强度。使用ProTaper Universal™旋转锉(美国宾夕法尼亚州约克市登士柏西诺德牙髓病公司)对60颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙的根管进行预备。预备过程中用5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗根管。根管预备后,用2 mL 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗(1分钟),接着用2 mL 5.25% NaOCl冲洗(5分钟),再用2 mL生理盐水冲洗。用纸尖吸干根管,并根据桩系统类型随机分为两个研究组(每组n = 30):第1组,FiberSite™桩(意大利帕尔塔纳市MegaDental公司);第2组,Cytec™ Blanco桩(德国柯尼希斯巴赫 - 施泰因市哈嫩克拉特公司),每组使用两种粘结树脂水门汀中的一种:A亚组,Panavia™ SA Cement Plus Automix(日本大阪可乐丽公司);B亚组,Maxcem™ Elite(美国加利福尼亚州奥兰治市克尔公司)。热循环后,采用推出粘结强度试验评估粘结强度。使用体视显微镜进行断口分析。采用双向方差分析对数据进行分析(α = 0.05)。当与B亚组(Maxcem™ Elite)粘结时,两种桩的粘结强度值均显著更高。1B组(FiberSite™桩与Maxcem™ Elite水门汀粘结)表现出最高的粘结强度值。对于两种粘结材料,桩的类型对粘结强度值均无显著影响。