Centre on Aging and Mobility, University Hospital Zurich, Waid City Hospital, and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Basel University Medicine of Aging, Felix-Platter Spital, Basel, Switzerland.
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Nov;30(11):2205-2215. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05110-7. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
In this prospective study, half of all falls resulted in injury. Pre-frail adults sustained more injuries, while more frail adults had injuries requiring hospitalization or fractures. Pre-frail adults fell more often when in movement compared with frail adults who fell more often when standing and in indoor public spaces.
To assess prospectively how fall environment and direction are related to injury among pre-frail and frail adults.
We included 200 community-dwelling adults with a prior fall (pre-frail, mean age 77 years) and 173 adults with acute hip fracture (frail, mean age 84 years; 77% community-dwelling). Falls were prospectively recorded using standardized protocols in monthly intervals, including date, time, fall direction and environment, and injury. We used logistic regression to assess the odds of injury adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), and gender.
We recorded 513 falls and 331 fall-related injuries (64.5%) among the 373 participants. While the fall rate was similar between groups, pre-frail adults had more injuries (71% among pre-frail vs. 56% among frail, p = 0.0004) but a lower incidence of major injuries (9% among pre-frail vs. 27% among frail, p = 0.003). Pre-frail adults fell more often while in movement (84% among pre-frail vs. 55% among frail, p < 0.0001), and frail adults fell more often while standing (26% vs. 15% respectively, p = 0.01). The odds of injury among frail adults was increased 3.3-fold when falling sideways (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.68-6.45) and 2.4-fold when falling in an indoor public space (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.00-5.53), and was reduced when falling at home (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.31-0.98). The odds of injury among pre-frail adults was not influenced by environment and was 53% lower when falling backwards (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.26-0.82).
While pre-frail adults sustain more fall-related injuries, frail adults were more likely to sustain major injuries, especially when falling sideways or outside their home.
前瞻性评估虚弱和非虚弱成年人的跌倒环境和方向与损伤的关系。
我们纳入了 200 名有既往跌倒史的社区居住成年人(虚弱,平均年龄 77 岁)和 173 名急性髋部骨折的成年人(虚弱,平均年龄 84 岁;77%社区居住)。使用标准化方案在每月间隔记录跌倒情况,包括日期、时间、跌倒方向和环境以及损伤。我们使用逻辑回归来调整年龄、体重指数(BMI)和性别后评估损伤的优势比。
在 373 名参与者中,我们记录了 513 次跌倒和 331 次跌倒相关损伤(64.5%)。虽然两组的跌倒率相似,但虚弱成年人的损伤更多(虚弱组 71%,非虚弱组 56%,p=0.0004),但主要损伤的发生率较低(虚弱组 9%,非虚弱组 27%,p=0.003)。虚弱成年人更多地在移动时跌倒(虚弱组 84%,非虚弱组 55%,p<0.0001),而非虚弱成年人更多地在站立时跌倒(虚弱组 26%,非虚弱组 15%,p=0.01)。虚弱成年人跌倒时向侧面的损伤风险增加 3.3 倍(OR=3.29,95%CI=1.68-6.45),跌倒在室内公共场所的损伤风险增加 2.4 倍(OR=2.35,95%CI=1.00-5.53),而跌倒在家中的损伤风险降低(OR=0.55,95%CI=0.31-0.98)。非虚弱成年人的损伤风险不受环境影响,向后跌倒时损伤风险降低 53%(OR=0.47,95%CI=0.26-0.82)。
尽管虚弱的成年人发生跌倒相关损伤的比例更高,但虚弱的成年人更有可能发生重大损伤,尤其是向侧面或在其家外跌倒时。