Suppr超能文献

手法复位联合经皮椎体成形术治疗伴有椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折

[Manual reduction combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral clefts].

作者信息

Wei Hong-Yu, Dong Chun-Ke, Zhou Jun, Wang Yan-Lei, Tang Xiang-Sheng, Tan Ming-Sheng

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Jul 25;32(7):591-597. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.07.002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the therapeutic efficacy of manual reduction combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs) with intravertebral clefts.

METHODS

The clinical data of 94 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral clefts treated from January 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A and group B according to different operative methods. In group A, 45 patients were treated with unilateral approach PVP, including 17 males and 28 females, aged (75.35±11.82) years old, with a bone density T-value of (-4.28±0.65) g/cm³; in group B, 49 patients treated with manual reduction combined with unilateral approach PVP, including 19 males and 30 females, aged (76.79±9.64) years old, with a bone density T-value of (-4.33±0.72) g/cm³. The operation time, bone cement injection volume and postoperative complications of two groups were recorded. The VAS and ODI scores of two groups were analyzed respectively at 1, 12, 18 months after operation. Vertebral height and kyphosis Cobb angle of two groups were compared immediately after surgery and 12, 18 months after operation. The distribution of bone cement in the vertebral body was observed and its distribution excellent rate was calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operation time between two groups. The amount of bone cement injection was(8.42±1.24) ml in group A and(9.19±1.09) ml in group B, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant(<0.05). No spinal nerve root injury during operation and no complications including pulmonary embolism, bone cement toxicity and infection were found in two groups. There were 5 cases of bone cement leakage in group A and 4 cases in group B, which did not cause corresponding clinical symptoms and were not treated additionally. The distribution of bone cement in group A was excellent in 25 cases, good in 19 cases, poor in 1 case and in group B was excellent in 45 cases, good in 4 cases. The distribution excellent rate of bone cement was higher in group B than in group A (<0.05). The VAS and ODI scores before operation and 1, 12, 18 months after operation were 8.29±0.74, 2.59±0.14, 3.75±0.38, 3.84±0.88 and 40.04±3.16, 9.24±2.82, 12.27±2.64, 15.83±2.58 in group A, 8.22±0.82, 2.54±0.19, 2.81±0.23, 2.82±0.45 and 39.98±2.05, 9.16±2.10, 9.46±2.41, 9.76±2.46 in group B. There was no significant difference in VAS and ODI scores at 1 month after operation between two groups (>0.05), but group A was higher than group B at 12 and 18 months after operation (<0.05). The vertebral height and Cobb angle before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 12, 18 months after surgery in group A were(59.17±1.42)%, (85.95±2.19)%, (75.27±3.45)%, (68.34±2.24)% and(23.83±3.37)°, (15.26±2.61)°, (17.63±2.16)°, (19.46±2.54)°, and in group B were(59.31±1.87)%, (89.19±2.53)%, (88.62±2.51)%, (88.59±2.62)% and(24.72±3.78)°, (14.91±2.28)°, (15.48±2.55)°, (15.86±2.81)°. Vertebral height Immediately after surgery was greater in group B than in group A and Cobb angle in group B was smaller than in group A (<0.05). During follow-up, there was no significant change in vertebral height in group B, while vertebral body recollapse in group A(<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral clefts, the manual reduction combined with PVP is more effective than single PVP, which can effectively prevent vertebral body recollapse and improve the long-term efficacy of patients.

摘要

目的

探讨手法复位联合经皮椎体成形术治疗合并椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年1月收治的94例合并椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的临床资料。根据手术方式不同将患者分为A组和B组。A组45例采用单侧入路经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗,其中男性17例,女性28例,年龄(75.35±11.82)岁,骨密度T值为(-4.28±0.65)g/cm³;B组49例采用手法复位联合单侧入路PVP治疗,其中男性19例,女性30例,年龄(76.79±9.64)岁,骨密度T值为(-4.33±0.72)g/cm³。记录两组手术时间、骨水泥注入量及术后并发症。分别于术后1、12、18个月分析两组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。比较两组术后即刻、术后12、18个月椎体高度及后凸Cobb角。观察骨水泥在椎体内的分布情况并计算其分布优良率。

结果

两组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义。A组骨水泥注入量为(8.42±1.24)ml,B组为(9.19±1.09)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两组术中均未发生脊神经根损伤,术后均未出现肺栓塞、骨水泥毒性反应及感染等并发症。A组发生骨水泥渗漏5例,B组发生4例,均未引起相应临床症状,未予特殊处理。A组骨水泥分布优25例,良19例,差1例;B组骨水泥分布优45例,良4例。B组骨水泥分布优良率高于A组(<0.05)。A组术前及术后1、12、18个月VAS评分分别为8.29±0.74、2.59±0.14、3.75±0.38、3.84±0.88,ODI评分分别为40.04±3.16、9.24±2.82、12.27±2.64、15.83±2.58;B组术前及术后1、12、18个月VAS评分分别为8.22±0.82、2.54±0.19、2.81±0.23、2.82±0.45,ODI评分分别为39.98±2.05、9.16±2.10、9.46±2.41、9.76±2.46。两组术后1个月VAS及ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05),但术后12、18个月A组高于B组(<0.05)。A组术前、术后即刻、术后12、18个月椎体高度分别为(59.17±1.42)%、(85.95±2.19)%、(75.27±3.45)%、(68.34±2.24)%,Cobb角分别为(23.83±3.37)°、(15.26±2.61)°、(17.63±2.16)°、(19.46±2.54)°;B组术前、术后即刻、术后12、18个月椎体高度分别为(59.31±1.87)%、(89.19±2.53)%、(88.62±2.51)%、(88.59±2.62)%,Cobb角分别为(24.72±3.78)°、(14.91±2.28)°、(15.48±2.55)°、(15.86±2.81)°。术后即刻B组椎体高度大于A组,Cobb角小于A组(<0.05)。随访期间,B组椎体高度无明显变化,A组椎体发生再塌陷(<0.05)。

结论

在治疗合并椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折时,手法复位联合PVP较单纯PVP更有效,可有效防止椎体再塌陷,提高患者远期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验