Suppr超能文献

沿海基础设施的泥沙管理:替代疏浚技术的技术经济和环境影响评估。

Sediment management in coastal infrastructures: Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of alternative technologies to dredging.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Via Fontanelle 40, 47100, Forli, Italy.

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40100, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109332. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109332. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

Abstract

The presence of anthropic activity in the coastal or riverine environment modifies the wave as well as the water and sediment current regime. In particular, the body of water around ports is an area where intense currents and sediment transport rates are usually present and can be affected by low water velocities that take place close to the entrance and inside the port basin. Consequently, sediment can be entrained and accumulated in such areas, creating problems to navigation. Ports and moorings are filled with fine sediments due to deposition resulting from solid transport. In particular, silt particles settle because of the weak vertical and lateral shearing of the velocity field. The result is that harbours frequently require ordinary maintenance dredging. The dredging process involves the removal of sediment in its natural deposited condition by using either mechanical or hydraulic equipment. Dredging is a consolidated and proven technology, but involves considerable drawbacks. In particular, dredging has a notable environmental impact on marine flora and fauna, contributes to the mobility and diffusion of contaminants and pollutants already present in the silted sediments, obstructs navigation and is characterized by relatively high and low predictable costs. This paper aims to provide an original structured overview of technologies alternative to dredging that have been tested in the past 50 years. More than 150 articles have been analysed to compare standard dredging technologies with market-ready competitors from techno-economic and environmental perspectives. In particular, the paper focuses on anti-sedimentation infrastructures and on innovative plant solutions characterized by low maintenance costs and by a very limited environmental impact. The final aim of the paper is to describe the currently available technologies that prevent port inlet and channel siltation and to classify them through a techno-economic and environmental impact assessment. The comparison shows that dredging has both the higher costs and environmental impact, while fixed sand by-passing plants are characterized by the lowest environmental impact and operation costs that are competitive with dredging.

摘要

人为活动在沿海或河流环境中的存在会改变波浪以及水流和泥沙流的流动状态。特别是港口周围的水体是一个水流和泥沙输运速率通常较强的区域,而且可能会受到靠近入口和港口水域内部发生的低水流速度的影响。因此,泥沙可能会在这些区域被夹带和积累,从而导致航行问题。由于固体输送导致的沉积,港口和系泊处充满了细颗粒泥沙。特别是,由于速度场的垂直和侧向剪切较弱,淤泥颗粒会沉降。结果是港口经常需要进行普通的维护性疏浚。疏浚过程涉及使用机械或水力设备去除自然沉积的泥沙。疏浚是一种成熟且经过验证的技术,但涉及到相当大的缺点。特别是,疏浚对海洋动植物具有显著的环境影响,会促进已经存在于淤积沉积物中的污染物和污染物的迁移和扩散,阻碍航行,并且具有相对较高和不可预测的成本。本文旨在提供过去 50 年中经过测试的替代疏浚技术的原始结构化概述。为了从技术经济和环境角度对标准疏浚技术与市场就绪的竞争对手进行比较,分析了 150 多篇文章。特别是,本文重点介绍了防淤积基础设施和具有低维护成本和非常有限的环境影响的创新工厂解决方案。本文的最终目的是描述可防止港口入口和航道淤积的现有技术,并通过技术经济和环境影响评估对其进行分类。比较表明,疏浚的成本和环境影响最高,而固定的泥沙旁路工厂的环境影响和运营成本最低,与疏浚具有竞争力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验