Suppr超能文献

PILL-5的验证:一种用于药丸吞咽困难的5项患者报告结局指标

Validation of the PILL-5: A 5-Item Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Pill Dysphagia.

作者信息

Nativ-Zeltzer Nogah, Bayoumi Ahmed, Mandin Van Pierre, Kaufman Matthew, Seeni Indulaxmi, Kuhn Maggie A, Belafsky Peter C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center for Voice and Swallowing, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2019 Jul 24;6:43. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00043. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Pill dysphagia is common and costly with a significant risk of pill retention, caustic injury, and poor medication compliance. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity and reliability of the PILL-5, a self-administered patient reported outcome measure (PROM) to quantify the degree of pill (tablet and capsule) dysphagia. The PILL-5 is a 5-item questionnaire with a maximum symptom score of 20. The PILL-5 was administered to 190 patients with dysphagia referred for videofluoroscopic esophagography (VFE). Construct validity was assessed by comparing PILL-5 composite scores to delayed barium tablet transit on VFE. Normative data was obtained by administering the instrument to a cohort of healthy community based volunteers. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. Test/retest reliability was determined by administering the instrument to the same cohort of patients at two time points. The mean PILL-5 was 5.6 (±4.9) for persons with dysphagia and 1.6 (±2.7) for healthy volunteers ( < 0.001). The internal consistency of the instrument was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.85). The mean PILL-5 was 4.3 (±4.1) for patients with normal transit and 7.6 (±5.3) for patients with delayed barium tablet transit on esophagography, indicating excellent criterion based validity ( < 0.001). Reproducibility was high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 ( < 0.001). Healthy individuals report some degree of swallowing difficulty with pills. Normative data suggest that a PILL-5 > 6 is abnormal (mean + 2 SD). The instrument demonstrated excellent criterion based validity and reliability. The PILL-5 is the first validated patient reported outcome measure for pill dysphagia.

摘要

吞咽药丸困难很常见且代价高昂,存在药丸滞留、腐蚀性损伤和用药依从性差的重大风险。本研究的目的是确定PILL-5的有效性和可靠性,PILL-5是一种患者自我管理的报告结局指标(PROM),用于量化药丸(片剂和胶囊)吞咽困难的程度。PILL-5是一份包含5个条目的问卷,最高症状评分为20分。对190名因吞咽困难而接受视频荧光吞咽造影检查(VFE)的患者进行了PILL-5问卷调查。通过比较PILL-5综合评分与VFE上钡剂片剂延迟通过情况来评估结构效度。通过对一组基于社区的健康志愿者使用该工具获得了规范数据。使用Cronbach α评估内部一致性。通过在两个时间点对同一组患者使用该工具来确定重测信度。吞咽困难患者的PILL-5平均分为5.6(±4.9),健康志愿者的平均分为1.6(±2.7)(P<0.001)。该工具的内部一致性较高(Cronbach α = 0.85)。食管造影检查中钡剂通过正常的患者PILL-5平均分为4.3(±4.1),钡剂片剂延迟通过的患者PILL-5平均分为7.6(±5.3),表明基于标准的效度极佳(P<0.001)。组内相关系数为0.83,重测信度较高(P<0.001)。健康个体报告在吞咽药丸时存在一定程度的困难。规范数据表明,PILL-5>6为异常(均值+2标准差)。该工具显示出极佳的基于标准的效度和可靠性。PILL-5是首个经过验证的用于评估药丸吞咽困难的患者报告结局指标。

相似文献

1
Validation of the PILL-5: A 5-Item Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Pill Dysphagia.
Front Surg. 2019 Jul 24;6:43. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00043. eCollection 2019.
2
Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.
4
Validation of the Hebrew Version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (H-EAT-10).
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(6):261-267. doi: 10.1159/000484557. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related oropharyngeal dysphagia.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1861-1868. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5001-9. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: a caregiver administered dyphagia-specific outcome instrument for children.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(17):2088-2092. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1323235. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2464-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184366.71761.84.
9
The development and validation of the laryngopharyngeal measure of perceived sensation.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):2767-2772. doi: 10.1002/lary.28348. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
An Interdisciplinary Approach to Assistive Technology for Parkinson's Disease Dementia.
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Aug 15;20:1253-1265. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S516786. eCollection 2025.
2
Solid Medication Intake in Hospitalised Patients With Dysphagia: A Challenge for Speech and Language Pathologists?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70073. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70073.
4
Prevalence of self-reported voice and swallowing complaints in an outpatient geriatric population.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep 9;9(5):e70012. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70012. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
The Psychological Impacts of Pill Dysphagia: A Mixed Methods Study.
Dysphagia. 2024 Dec;39(6):1202-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10703-4. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Oral intake of solid medications in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. A challenge for nurses?
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Mar;34(3):872-882. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17081. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
7
Implementing a medication lubricant for pill dysphagia on an acute care ward using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 19;12(4):e002505. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002505.
8
KidzMed e-learning to upskill student pharmacists to teach pill swallowing to children.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282070. eCollection 2023.
10
Dysphagia for medication in Parkinson's disease.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022 Nov 12;8(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00421-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Oral Solid Medications in Elderly Dysphagic Patients.
Pharmaceutics. 2018 Dec 16;10(4):280. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040280.
2
Oral drug therapy in elderly with dysphagia: between a rock and a hard place!
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Jan 31;12:241-251. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S121905. eCollection 2017.
4
Novel methods of drug administration for the treatment and care of older patients.
Int J Pharm. 2016 Oct 30;512(2):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.050. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
Challenges in oral drug delivery in patients with esophageal dysphagia.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(5):645-58. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2016.1142971. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Older adults with difficulty swallowing oral medicines: a systematic review of the literature.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;72(2):141-51. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1979-8. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
7
Pill Properties that Cause Dysphagia and Treatment Failure.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2015 Aug 20;77:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015 Dec.
8
Phagophobia: a case report.
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Aug 27;7:574. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-574.
9
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of drug-induced esophagitis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 21;20(31):10994-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10994.
10
Drug-induced esophageal ulcers: case series and the review of the literature.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;25(2):180-4. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2014.5415.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验