Booz Allen Hamilton, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 1;380:114707. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114707. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
New approach methodologies (NAMs) in chemical safety evaluation are being explored to address the current public health implications of human environmental exposures to chemicals with limited or no data for assessment. For over a decade since a push toward "Toxicity Testing in the 21 Century," the field has focused on massive data generation efforts to inform computational approaches for preliminary hazard identification, adverse outcome pathways that link molecular initiating events and key events to apical outcomes, and high-throughput approaches to risk-based ratios of bioactivity and exposure to inform relative priority and safety assessment. Projects like the interagency Tox21 program and the US EPA ToxCast program have generated dose-response information on thousands of chemicals, identified and aggregated information from legacy systems, and created tools for access and analysis. The resulting information has been used to develop computational models as viable options for regulatory applications. This progress has introduced challenges in data management that are new, but not unique, to toxicology. Some of the key questions require critical thinking and solutions to promote semantic interoperability, including: (1) identification of bioactivity information from NAMs that might be related to a biological process; (2) identification of legacy hazard information that might be related to a key event or apical outcomes of interest; and, (3) integration of these NAM and traditional data for computational modeling and prediction of complex apical outcomes such as carcinogenesis. This work reviews a number of toxicology-related efforts specifically related to bioactivity and toxicological data interoperability based on the goals established by Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Data Principles. These efforts are essential to enable better integration of NAM and traditional toxicology information to support data-driven toxicology applications.
正在探索新的化学安全评估方法 (NAMs),以解决人类环境暴露于有限或缺乏评估数据的化学物质对当前公共健康的影响。自“21 世纪毒理学测试”推动以来的十多年来,该领域一直专注于大规模数据生成工作,以告知计算方法进行初步危害识别、将分子起始事件和关键事件与顶端结果联系起来的不良结局途径,以及高通量方法来确定生物活性和暴露的风险比,以告知相对优先级和安全性评估。像跨机构 Tox21 计划和美国环保署 ToxCast 计划这样的项目已经生成了数千种化学物质的剂量反应信息,识别和汇总了遗留系统中的信息,并创建了访问和分析工具。由此产生的信息已被用于开发计算模型作为监管应用的可行选择。这一进展在数据管理方面带来了新的挑战,这些挑战在毒理学中并非独一无二。其中一些关键问题需要批判性思维和解决方案来促进语义互操作性,包括:(1) 从可能与生物过程相关的 NAMs 中识别生物活性信息;(2) 识别可能与关键事件或感兴趣的顶端结局相关的遗留危害信息;以及,(3) 将这些 NAM 和传统数据集成用于计算建模和预测复杂的顶端结局,如致癌作用。这项工作根据可发现性、可访问性、互操作性和可重用性 (FAIR) 数据原则所确立的目标,审查了许多与生物活性和毒理学数据互操作性相关的毒理学相关努力。这些努力对于更好地整合 NAM 和传统毒理学信息以支持数据驱动的毒理学应用至关重要。