Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Sijua, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1031-1044. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00841-1.
The combination of an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor having different biological targets has become an integral part of the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, several clinical studies have reported conflicting results.
The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of an endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
After performing a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, reviewers assessed eligibility and extracted data from seven relevant articles (publications till December 2018). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis and reporting of findings. The odds ratio and mean difference were calculated to estimate the difference in clinical worsening, 6-minute walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide between the groups. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool and a meta-regression for probable variables affecting effect size.
The random-effect model analysis revealed an odds ratio of 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.76; p = 0.0002] for clinical worsening, mean difference of 15.64 (95% CI 2.67-28.61; p = 0.02) for 6-minute walking distance, - 1.66 (95% CI - 3.82 to 0.50; p = 0.13) for pulmonary vascular resistance and - 21.04 (95% CI - 26.87 to - 15.22; p < 0.00001) for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between the dose and duration of treatment and outcomes (odds ratio of clinical worsening and mean difference of 6-minute walking distance).
In pulmonary arterial hypertension, endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor combination therapy significantly improved 6-minute walking distance, clinical worsening and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide compared with the monotherapy but did not offer any advantage in improving pulmonary vascular resistance.
CRD42018091133.
内皮素受体拮抗剂和磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂的联合使用具有不同的生物学靶点,已成为肺动脉高压治疗不可或缺的一部分;然而,多项临床研究报告结果相互矛盾。
本荟萃分析旨在评估内皮素受体拮抗剂和磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂联合治疗肺动脉高压的效果。
通过在 MEDLINE、Cochrane 和国际临床试验注册平台进行全面的文献检索,评审员评估了 7 篇相关文章(截至 2018 年 12 月的出版物)的入选资格并提取了数据。在选择、分析和报告结果时,遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。使用优势比和平均差异来估算两组间临床恶化、6 分钟步行距离、肺血管阻力和 N 端脑利钠肽前体的差异。使用偏倚风险评估工具和对可能影响效应大小的变量进行的荟萃回归进行质量评估。
随机效应模型分析显示,临床恶化的优势比为 0.56(95%置信区间 0.41-0.76;p=0.0002),6 分钟步行距离的平均差异为 15.64(95%置信区间 2.67-28.61;p=0.02),肺血管阻力的平均差异为 -1.66(95%置信区间 -3.82 至 0.50;p=0.13),N 端脑利钠肽前体的平均差异为 -21.04(95%置信区间 -26.87 至 -15.22;p<0.00001)。荟萃回归显示,治疗剂量和持续时间与结局(临床恶化的优势比和 6 分钟步行距离的平均差异)之间无统计学显著关联。
在肺动脉高压中,内皮素受体拮抗剂和磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂联合治疗在改善 6 分钟步行距离、临床恶化和 N 端脑利钠肽前体方面明显优于单药治疗,但在改善肺血管阻力方面没有优势。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018091133。