Suppr超能文献

单纯动脉型手指末节离断再植术中不同外出血方法的疗效及比较

Survival and Comparison of External Bleeding Methods in Artery-Only Distal Finger Replantations.

作者信息

Kayalar Murat, Güntürk Özgün Barış, Gürbüz Yusuf, Toros Tulgar, Sügün Tahir Sadık, Ademoğlu Yalçın

机构信息

Emot Hospital, İzmir, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Hand Surgery Department, Gaziantep Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Mar;45(3):256.e1-256.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

If there are no veins available in a distal amputation, an artery-only replantation is performed, and an external bleeding method is commonly used. We conducted a survival analysis in a large series of artery-only replantations and compared 2 different external bleeding methods in artery-only distal replantations: nail matrix or hyponychial area bleeding and pulp skin area bleeding, which we have called the crater method.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-eight artery-only distal finger replantations in 199 patients were included in the study. The replanted digits were divided into 2 groups according to the external bleeding methods. One group (n = 94; 41.2%) included the patients in whom the external bleeding was performed using a traditional nail bed incision and the second group (n = 134; 58.8%) included the patients in whom external bleeding was performed using the crater method. The finger survival rates and postoperative circulatory problems were examined. The impact of the injury mechanism, injury level, and external bleeding method on survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Clinical findings indicating venous insufficiency were observed in 198 (86.8%) replanted fingers. One hundred eighty-two (79.8%) survived, and complete necrosis developed in 46 (20.2%). Viability was maintained in 84% of patients treated with the nail bed bleeding method and 76.9% of patients treated using the crater method. Clean-cut cases had the best results and subzone 3 cases had the worst results.

CONCLUSIONS

The artery-only replantation was associated with a 79.8% survival rate. The method of achieving venous outflow did not appear to have an impact on survival.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

摘要

目的

如果在远端断肢中没有可用的静脉,则进行单纯动脉再植,通常采用外部出血方法。我们对大量单纯动脉再植病例进行了生存分析,并比较了单纯动脉远端再植中两种不同的外部出血方法:甲床或甲下区域出血与我们称为火山口法的指腹皮肤区域出血。

方法

本研究纳入了199例患者的228例单纯动脉远端手指再植病例。根据外部出血方法将再植手指分为两组。一组(n = 94;41.2%)包括采用传统甲床切口进行外部出血的患者,第二组(n = 134;58.8%)包括采用火山口法进行外部出血的患者。检查手指存活率和术后循环问题。评估损伤机制、损伤水平和外部出血方法对存活的影响。

结果

198例(86.8%)再植手指观察到提示静脉功能不全的临床发现。182例(79.8%)存活,46例(20.2%)发生完全坏死。采用甲床出血法治疗的患者中84%维持了存活能力,采用火山口法治疗的患者中76.9%维持了存活能力。切割伤病例结果最佳,3区病例结果最差。

结论

单纯动脉再植的存活率为79.8%。实现静脉流出的方法似乎对存活没有影响。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验