Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom; Epilepsy Society Research Centre, Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Feb;103(Pt B):106456. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106456. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
Over the last few years, there has been significant expansion of wearable technologies and devices into the health sector, including for conditions such as epilepsy. Although there is significant potential to benefit patients, there is a paucity of well-conducted scientific research in order to inform patients and healthcare providers of the most appropriate technology. In addition to either directly or indirectly identifying seizure activity, the ideal device should improve quality of life and reduce the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Devices typically monitor a number of parameters including electroencephalographic (EEG), cardiac, and respiratory patterns and can detect movement, changes in skin conductance, and muscle activity. Multimodal devices are emerging with improved seizure detection rates and reduced false positive alarms. While convulsive seizures are reliably identified by most unimodal and multimodal devices, seizures associated with no, or minimal, movement are frequently undetected. The vast majority of current devices detect but do not actively intervene. At best, therefore, they indicate the presence of seizure activity in order to accurately ascertain true seizure frequency or facilitate intervention by others, which may, nevertheless, impact the rate of SUDEP. Future devices are likely to both detect and intervene within an autonomous closed-loop system tailored to the individual and by self-learning from the analysis of patient-specific parameters. The formulation of standards for regulatory bodies to validate seizure detection devices is also of paramount importance in order to confidently ascertain the performance of a device; and this will be facilitated by the creation of a large, open database containing multimodal annotated data in order to test device algorithms. This paper is for the Special Issue: Prevent 21: SUDEP Summit - Time to Listen.
在过去的几年中,可穿戴技术和设备在医疗领域得到了广泛的应用,包括癫痫等疾病。尽管这些技术有很大的潜力使患者受益,但为了让患者和医疗保健提供者了解最合适的技术,还需要进行大量精心设计的科学研究。除了直接或间接识别癫痫发作活动外,理想的设备还应改善生活质量并降低癫痫猝死(SUDEP)的风险。设备通常监测多个参数,包括脑电图(EEG)、心脏和呼吸模式,还可以检测运动、皮肤电导率变化和肌肉活动。多模态设备的出现提高了癫痫发作的检测率并减少了假阳性警报。虽然大多数单模态和多模态设备都能可靠地识别出癫痫大发作,但与无运动或运动幅度最小的癫痫发作通常无法检测到。目前绝大多数设备都可以检测到癫痫发作,但不会主动干预。因此,它们最多可以指示癫痫活动的存在,以准确确定真正的癫痫发作频率或便于他人进行干预,但这可能会影响 SUDEP 的发生率。未来的设备可能会在针对个体的自主闭环系统中进行检测和干预,并通过对患者特定参数的分析进行自我学习。制定监管机构的标准来验证癫痫检测设备也非常重要,以便有信心确定设备的性能;这将通过创建一个包含多模态注释数据的大型开放数据库来实现,以便测试设备算法。本文是为“预防 21:SUDEP 峰会-倾听时间”特刊而写。