Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Section of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of the Philippines Manila Pedro Gil St.
Dent Mater J. 2019 Oct 2;38(5):790-797. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-129. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of desensitizer pre-treatment on in-office bleaching using an artificial discoloration tooth model. The stained specimens were divided into four groups (n=10); without application (Control group), Shield Force plus (SF group), UltraEz (UE group) and Teeth Mate AP paste (TM group) applied before bleaching. Each group was bleached by an in-office bleaching agent. The CIE Lab* values were measured by a colorimeter before and after ten consecutive bleaching treatments and the color difference (∆E) was calculated. There was no statistical difference among ∆E values of Control, UE, and TM groups (p>0.05). There was a significant difference between SF and Control groups (p<0.001). It was concluded that application of TM and UE did not affect the change of tooth shade while SF application impeded the bleaching effect.
本体外研究旨在评估脱敏剂预处理对使用人工变色牙模型的诊室漂白的影响。染色标本分为四组(n=10);无应用(对照组)、Shield Force plus(SF 组)、UltraEz(UE 组)和 Teeth Mate AP 膏(TM 组)在漂白前应用。每组均用诊室漂白剂漂白。使用比色计在连续 10 次漂白处理前后测量 CIE Lab*值,并计算色差(∆E)。对照组、UE 组和 TM 组的 ∆E 值之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。SF 组与对照组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。结果表明,TM 和 UE 的应用并不影响牙齿颜色的变化,而 SF 的应用则阻碍了漂白效果。