Schnebelen Damien, Lappi Otto, Mole Callum, Pekkanen Jami, Mars Franck
Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N), CNRS, Nantes, France.
Department of Digital Humanities, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 8;10:1699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01699. eCollection 2019.
When negotiating bends car drivers perform gaze polling: their gaze shifts between guiding fixations (GFs; gaze directed 1-2 s ahead) and look-ahead fixations (LAFs; longer time headway). How might this behavior change in autonomous vehicles where the need for constant active visual guidance is removed? In this driving simulator study, we analyzed this gaze behavior both when the driver was in charge of steering or when steering was delegated to automation, separately for bend approach (straight line) and the entry of the bend (turn), and at various speeds. The analysis of gaze distributions relative to bend sections and driving conditions indicate that visual anticipation (through LAFs) is most prominent before entering the bend. Passive driving increased the proportion of LAFs with a concomitant decrease of GFs, and increased the gaze polling frequency. Gaze polling frequency also increased at higher speeds, in particular during the bend approach when steering was not performed. LAFs encompassed a wide range of eccentricities. To account for this heterogeneity two sub-categories serving distinct information requirements are proposed: mid-eccentricity LAFs could be more useful for anticipatory planning of steering actions, and far-eccentricity LAFs for monitoring potential hazards. The results support the idea that gaze and steering coordination may be strongly impacted in autonomous vehicles.
在弯道行驶时,汽车驾驶员会进行注视轮询:他们的目光会在引导注视(GFs;目光指向提前1 - 2秒的位置)和前瞻注视(LAFs;更长的车头时距)之间切换。在无需持续主动视觉引导的自动驾驶车辆中,这种行为会如何变化呢?在这项驾驶模拟器研究中,我们分别针对弯道接近(直线段)和弯道进入(转弯)阶段,以及在不同速度下,分析了驾驶员负责转向和转向委托给自动化系统这两种情况下的注视行为。相对于弯道部分和驾驶条件的注视分布分析表明,视觉预期(通过LAFs)在进入弯道之前最为显著。被动驾驶增加了LAFs的比例,同时减少了GFs的比例,并提高了注视轮询频率。注视轮询频率在较高速度下也会增加,特别是在不进行转向操作的弯道接近阶段。LAFs涵盖了广泛的偏心率范围。为了解释这种异质性,我们提出了两个满足不同信息需求的子类别:中等偏心率的LAFs可能对转向动作的预期规划更有用,而远偏心率的LAFs则用于监测潜在危险。研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即注视与转向的协调在自动驾驶车辆中可能会受到强烈影响。