Bielefeld University, Department of Animal Ecology, Konsequenz 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University, Department of Animal Ecology, Konsequenz 45, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Nov 15;183:109596. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109596. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
The lower tier toxicity tests used for risk assessment of plant protection products are conducted with single species, only regarding direct effects of the tested substances. However, it is not clear, if lower tier tests are able to protect in situ soil communities, as these tests are not able to account for direct and indirect effects of chemicals on multi-species systems in natural soil communities. This knowledge gap between single-species tests and field studies can be bridged using model ecosystems (microcosms), which allow for the assessment of direct and indirect effects of the compounds under evaluation. In the present study, single-species toxicity tests and soil-spiked microcosms were used to comparatively investigate the toxicity of the non-systemic fungicide fludioxonil (FDO) on non-target soil organisms, with nematodes being the test organisms of choice. The potential effects of FDO on nematodes were investigated in two different test systems: (i) standardized toxicity tests using Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to FDO-spiked soil (FDO concentrations 50-1207 mg/kg soil dry weight) and (ii) in situ nematode communities sampled from microcosms containing FDO-spiked soil (FDO concentrations 75-600 mg/kg soil dry weight). FDO dose-dependently inhibited the reproduction of C. elegans, with an effect concentration (EC50) of 209.9 mg FDO/kg soil dry weight and a no observed effect concentration (NOEC) of 63.0 mg FDO/kg soil dry weight. In the microcosms, FDO significantly affected trait-based indices, such as the Maturity Index (MI25) and the Enrichment Index (EI), which responded already at FDO concentrations of 14.3 and 62.4 mg/kg dry soil. Overall, this study provides new insights into the impact of the non-systemic fungicide FDO on non-target soil organisms and demonstrates the suitability of nematode-based tools, that allow for a quick and cost-effective lower and higher tier risk assessment of plant protection products.
用于评估植物保护产品风险的低层次毒性测试是在单一物种的基础上进行的,仅考虑测试物质的直接影响。然而,目前尚不清楚低层次测试是否能够保护原位土壤群落,因为这些测试无法说明化学物质对自然土壤群落中多物种系统的直接和间接影响。在单一物种测试和现场研究之间的这种知识差距可以通过使用模型生态系统(微宇宙)来弥合,这允许评估正在评估的化合物的直接和间接影响。在本研究中,使用单一物种毒性测试和土壤接种微宇宙来比较研究非系统性杀菌剂氟啶酮(FDO)对非靶标土壤生物的毒性,其中线虫是首选的测试生物。使用两种不同的测试系统研究了 FDO 对线虫的潜在影响:(i)使用暴露于 FDO 污染土壤的秀丽隐杆线虫(C. elegans)进行的标准化毒性测试(FDO 浓度为 50-1207mg/kg 土壤干重)和(ii)从含有 FDO 污染土壤的微宇宙中采集的原位线虫群落(FDO 浓度为 75-600mg/kg 土壤干重)。FDO 浓度依赖性地抑制了 C. elegans 的繁殖,EC50为 209.9mg FDO/kg 土壤干重,NOEC 为 63.0mg FDO/kg 土壤干重。在微宇宙中,FDO 显著影响了基于特征的指数,如成熟指数(MI25)和富集指数(EI),在 FDO 浓度为 14.3 和 62.4mg/kg 干土时就已经出现了响应。总的来说,这项研究提供了关于非系统性杀菌剂 FDO 对非靶标土壤生物影响的新见解,并证明了基于线虫的工具的适用性,这些工具允许快速且具有成本效益地对植物保护产品进行低层次和高层次风险评估。