Suppr超能文献

免疫抑制治疗在 IgA 肾病中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2019 Aug 27;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1519-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigated the benefits and risks of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunosuppressive agents with any other non-immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of proteinuria, creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and adverse events in patients with IgAN, and trial sequential analyses were also performed for outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RCTs (1957 patients) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. Steroids (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.2 to - 0.20), non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (NSI) (WMD -0. 43, 95% CI - 0.55 to - 0.31), and combined steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (S&NSI) (WMD -1.46, 95% CI - 2.13 to - 0.79) therapy significantly reduced proteinuria levels compared with the the control group. Steroid treatment significantly reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (relative risk [RR] 0.39, CI 0.19 to 0.79) compared with the control group. The immunosuppressive therapy group showed significant increases in gastrointestinal, hematological, dermatological, and genitourinary side effects, as well as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Hyperkalemia was more common in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive therapy can significantly reduce proteinuria and ESRD risk in patients with IgAN, but with a concomitant increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, care is required in the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

摘要

背景

免疫抑制剂已广泛用于 IgA 肾病(IgAN)的治疗,但疗效和安全性仍存在争议。最近的 STOP-IgAN 和 TESTING 研究再次关注了免疫抑制剂在 IgAN 中的应用。本研究旨在探讨 IgAN 患者应用免疫抑制剂的获益和风险。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和文献参考文献,以获取比较免疫抑制剂与任何其他非免疫抑制剂治疗 IgAN 的随机对照试验(RCT)。对 IgAN 患者蛋白尿、肌酐(Cr)、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和不良事件结局进行 meta 分析,并进行试验序贯分析。

结果

共纳入 29 项符合纳入标准的 RCT(1957 例患者)。与对照组相比,激素(加权均数差 [WMD] -0.70,95%置信区间 [CI] -1.2 至 -0.20)、非甾体类免疫抑制剂(NSI)(WMD -0.43,95% CI -0.55 至 -0.31)和联合使用甾体类和非甾体类免疫抑制剂(S&NSI)(WMD -1.46,95% CI -2.13 至 -0.79)治疗显著降低蛋白尿水平。与对照组相比,激素治疗显著降低终末期肾病(ESRD)风险(相对风险 [RR] 0.39,95% CI 0.19 至 0.79)。免疫抑制治疗组胃肠道、血液、皮肤和泌尿生殖系统不良反应以及葡萄糖耐量受损或糖尿病的发生率显著增加。对照组更常见高钾血症。

结论

免疫抑制治疗可显著降低 IgAN 患者的蛋白尿和 ESRD 风险,但同时不良反应增加。因此,在 IgAN 中应用免疫抑制剂时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bd/6710882/0a02081c08fc/12882_2019_1519_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验