Freie Universität Berlin.
Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;55(9):1994-1997. doi: 10.1037/dev0000758.
This commentary critically assesses the importance and limitations of bioconstructionist research on emotional development within the discipline of psychology, broadly conceived, finding that it depends upon theories and methodologies concerning the study of culture that the humanities can provide. The established field of the history of emotions is introduced as a means of complicating bioconstruction by highlighting the contingency of the world in which emotional development takes place. Once the developing brain-body is understood to be historically specific, new questions emerge, old debates (especially about universality) are settled, and the pathway toward interdisciplinary collaboration on the question of experience opens up. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
这篇评论批判性地评估了生物建构主义研究在心理学学科内对情感发展的重要性和局限性,广义地说,它依赖于人文科学可以提供的关于文化研究的理论和方法。引入既定的情感史领域是为了通过突出情感发展发生的世界的偶然性来使生物建构复杂化。一旦理解了发展中的大脑-身体具有历史特殊性,就会出现新的问题,旧的争论(尤其是关于普遍性的争论)得到解决,并且为经验问题的跨学科合作开辟了道路。(心理学文摘数据库记录(c)2019APA,保留所有权利)。