Xu Wei-Bin, Chang Hsuan, Huang Jie, Chung Kuo-Fang
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuangzu Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, 541006, China.
Research Museum and Herbarium (HAST), Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Bot Stud. 2019 Aug 29;60(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40529-019-0266-x.
The Gesneriaceae genus Chiritopsis, confined almost exclusively to cave or cave-like microhabitats of limestone karsts of southern China, was described to distinguish it from Chirita by much smaller flowers and generally miniature plant sizes in the former genus. However, molecular phylogenetic analyses showed that Chiritopsis is polyphyletic and its species delimitation has been problematic. To understand how many times Chiritopsis-like species have evolved from within the recircumscribed Primulina and to further clarify their species identification, we sampled all but two recently described species of Chiritopsis-like Primulina and reconstructed their phylogenetic relationship based on DNA sequences of nuclear ITS and chloroplast trnL-F and trnH-psbA.
With 182 accessions of 165 taxa of Primulina sampled, our analyses placed the 40 accessions of 25 taxa of Chiritopsis-like Primulina in 17 unrelated positions, indicating at least 17 independent origins of the traits associated with caves or cave-like microhabitats. Of the 17 clades containing Chiritopsis-like Primulina, Clade 1 is composed of P. bipinnatifida, P. cangwuensis, P. jianghuaensis, P. lingchuanensis, and P. zhoui, as well as additional samples that show variable and overlapping morphology in leaf shapes. Clade 10 includes P. cordifolia, P. huangii, and P. repanda, while Primulina repanda var. guilinensis is not placed within Clade 10. Primulina glandulosa var. yangshuoensis is not placed in the same clade of P. glandulosa.
Based on our data, P. cangwuensis, P. jianghuaensis, and P. lingchuanensis are proposed to synonymize under P. bipinnatifida, with P. zhoui treated as a variety of P. bipinnatifida. Primulina repanda var. guilinensis is transferred as P. subulata var. guilinensis comb. nov. and Primulina pseudoglandulosa nom. nov. is proposed for P. glandulosa var. yangshuoensis. One new species is named P. chingipengii to honor the late Dr. Ching-I Peng (1950-2018).
报春花科唇柱苣苔属几乎仅局限于中国南方石灰岩岩溶地区的洞穴或类似洞穴的微生境,该属被描述为因其花小得多且植株通常较小而与唇柱苣苔属相区分。然而,分子系统发育分析表明唇柱苣苔属是多系的,其物种界定一直存在问题。为了解类似唇柱苣苔属的物种从重新界定的报春苣苔属中演化了多少次,并进一步澄清它们的物种鉴定,我们对除最近描述的两个唇柱苣苔属物种外的所有类似唇柱苣苔属的报春苣苔进行了采样,并基于核ITS以及叶绿体trnL-F和trnH-psbA的DNA序列重建了它们的系统发育关系。
在对165个报春苣苔分类群的182个样本进行分析时,我们的分析将25个分类群的40个类似唇柱苣苔属的报春苣苔样本置于17个不相关的位置,表明与洞穴或类似洞穴的微生境相关的性状至少有17个独立起源。在包含类似唇柱苣苔属的报春苣苔的17个分支中,分支1由羽裂报春苣苔、苍梧报春苣苔、江华报春苣苔、灵川报春苣苔和周氏报春苣苔以及其他叶形形态可变且有重叠的样本组成。分支10包括心叶报春苣苔、黄氏报春苣苔和圆齿报春苣苔,而桂林圆齿报春苣苔不在分支10内。阳朔腺毛报春苣苔不在腺毛报春苣苔的同一分支中。
根据我们的数据,建议将苍梧报春苣苔、江华报春苣苔和灵川报春苣苔作为羽裂报春苣苔的异名,周氏报春苣苔作为羽裂报春苣苔的一个变种处理。桂林圆齿报春苣苔被转移为桂林钻叶报春苣苔新组合变种,阳朔腺毛报春苣苔被提议命名为假腺毛报春苣苔新名称。一个新物种被命名为彭镜毅报春苣苔以纪念已故的彭镜毅博士(1950 - 2018)。