World Health Organization, Lusaka, Zambia.
Epicentre, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0219040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219040. eCollection 2019.
In April 2016, an emergency vaccination campaign using one dose of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) was organized in response to a cholera outbreak that started in Lusaka in February 2016. In December 2016, a second round of vaccination was conducted, with the objective of increasing the duration of protection, before the high-risk period for cholera transmission. We assessed vaccination coverage for the first and second rounds of the OCV campaign.
Vaccination coverage was estimated after each round from a sample selected from targeted-areas for vaccination using a cross-sectional survey in to establish the vaccination status of the individuals recruited. The study population included all individuals older than 12 months residing in the areas targeted for vaccination. We interviewed 505 randomly selected individuals after the first round and 442 after the second round. Vaccination status was ascertained either by vaccination card or verbal reporting. Households were selected using spatial random sampling.
The vaccination coverage with two doses was 58.1% (25/43; 95%CI: 42.1-72.9) in children 1-5 years old, 59.5% (69/116; 95%CI: 49.9-68.5) in children 5-15 years old and 19.9% (56/281; 95%CI: 15.4-25.1) in adults above 15 years old. The overall dropout rate was 10.9% (95%CI: 8.1-14.1). Overall, 69.9% (n = 309/442; 95%CI: 65.4-74.1) reported to have received at least one OCV dose.
The areas at highest risk of suffering cholera outbreaks were targeted for vaccination obtaining relatively high vaccine coverage after each round. However, the long delay between doses in areas subject to considerable population movement resulted in many individuals receiving only one OCV dose. Additional vaccination campaigns may be required to sustain protection over time in case of persistence of risk. Further evidence is needed to establish a maximum optimal interval time of a delayed second dose and variations in different settings.
2016 年 4 月,为应对 2016 年 2 月在卢萨卡爆发的霍乱疫情,组织开展了一次应急口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)接种活动,使用一剂疫苗。2016 年 12 月,开展了第二轮接种,目的是在霍乱传播高危期之前增加保护持续时间。我们评估了首轮和第二轮 OCV 接种活动的接种覆盖情况。
在每轮接种后,从接种目标地区中抽取一个样本,通过横断面调查来估计接种覆盖率,以确定招募个体的接种状况。研究人群包括居住在接种目标地区的所有 12 个月以上的个体。首轮接种后,我们随机采访了 505 人,第二轮后采访了 442 人。接种状况通过接种卡或口头报告来确定。家庭通过空间随机抽样选择。
1-5 岁儿童两剂接种率为 58.1%(25/43;95%CI:42.1-72.9),5-15 岁儿童为 59.5%(69/116;95%CI:49.9-68.5),15 岁以上成人为 19.9%(56/281;95%CI:15.4-25.1)。总失访率为 10.9%(95%CI:8.1-14.1)。总体而言,442 人中 69.9%(309/442;95%CI:65.4-74.1)报告至少接种了一剂 OCV。
霍乱疫情高发地区是接种的目标地区,每轮接种后都获得了相对较高的疫苗覆盖率。然而,在人口流动较大的地区,两剂之间的时间间隔较长,导致许多人只接种了一剂 OCV。如果风险持续存在,可能需要开展更多的疫苗接种活动,以保持长期保护。需要进一步的证据来确定延迟第二剂的最佳时间间隔,并确定不同环境下的变化。