Suppr超能文献

2016 年耳鼻喉患者倡导组织潜在利益冲突分析。

Analysis of Potential Conflicts of Interest among Otolaryngologic Patient Advocacy Organizations in 2016.

机构信息

The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):967-969. doi: 10.1177/0194599819874828. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

Abstract

Patient advocacy organizations (PAOs) are nonprofits dedicated to benefiting patients and their families through activities such as education/counseling and research funding. Although medical drug/device companies may serve as important partners, industry donations may bias the efforts of PAOs. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the Kaiser Health News nonprofit database to identify and characterize otolaryngologic PAOs (n = 32) active in 2016. Among these PAOs, half (n = 16, 50.0%) focused on otologic diseases, and mean total annual revenue was $3.1 million. Among the 15 PAOs (46.9%) with publicly available donor lists, 10 (66.7%) received donations from industry. Few PAOs publicly reported the total amount donated by industry (n = 3, 9.4%) or published policies for mitigating potential financial conflicts of interest with donors (n = 3, 9.4%). Requiring drug and device companies to publicly report donations to PAOs may help patients, providers, and policy makers to better understand advocacy by these influential stakeholders.

摘要

患者倡导组织(PAO)是致力于通过教育/咨询和研究资金等活动使患者及其家属受益的非营利组织。尽管医药/器械公司可能是重要的合作伙伴,但行业捐赠可能会使 PAO 的工作产生偏差。我们对 Kaiser Health News 的非营利组织数据库进行了回顾性横断面分析,以确定并描述在 2016 年活跃的耳鼻喉科 PAO(n = 32)。在这些 PAO 中,有一半(n = 16,50.0%)专注于耳科疾病,平均年收入为 310 万美元。在 15 个有公开捐赠者名单的 PAO(46.9%)中,有 10 个(66.7%)收到了行业的捐款。很少有 PAO 公开报告行业捐款的总额(n = 3,9.4%)或发布了减轻与捐赠者潜在财务利益冲突的政策(n = 3,9.4%)。要求制药和器械公司公开报告向 PAO 的捐款,可能有助于患者、医疗服务提供者和政策制定者更好地了解这些有影响力的利益相关者的倡导活动。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Potential Conflicts of Interest among Otolaryngologic Patient Advocacy Organizations in 2016.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):967-969. doi: 10.1177/0194599819874828. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Patient Advocacy Organizations, Industry Funding, and Conflicts of Interest.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):344-350. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8443.
3
Prevalence and Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest in Dermatology Patient Advocacy Organizations.
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):460-464. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5102.
4
A Content Analysis of Patient Advocacy Organization Policies Addressing Institutional Conflicts of Interest.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):215-221. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1670278. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Patient advocacy organizations: institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness.
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Fall;41(3):680-7. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12078.
7
Pharmaceutical Industry Support of US Patient Advocacy Organizations: An International Context.
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):559-561. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304946. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Food Industry Donations to Academic Programs: A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Extent of Publicly Available Data.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;17(5):1624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051624.
9
Industry Support of Patient Advocacy Organizations: The Case for an Extension of the Sunshine Act Provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):1026-1030. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304467. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Financial conflicts of interest among presenters, panellists and moderators at haematology and oncology FDA workshops.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2024 Jun;54(6):e14184. doi: 10.1111/eci.14184. Epub 2024 Feb 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验