Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, 1025 E. 7th Street, Suite 111, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Studies, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):1217. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7533-3.
The aim of this study was to investigate what factors predict knowledge about Zika transmission, symptomology, and treatment among U.S. travelers and, additionally, to evaluate how Zika knowledge influences the adoption of personal protective behaviors.
Data were collected as part of a cross-sectional survey study using a probability-based internet panel of U.S. travelers in June 2017. We ran logistic regression models of factors predicting Zika knowledge (high vs. low) and of knowledge predicting adoption of personal protective measures.
We found that traveling to a Zika endemic country and travelers' gender were both significantly predictive of higher Zika knowledge (odds ratio (OR): 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.93 and OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.08-1.92), adjusting for age, race, education, income, and trip purpose. Additionally, among travelers to Zika endemic countries, individuals with higher Zika knowledge had significantly higher odds of engaging in preventive behaviors compared to those with lower knowledge. However, few travelers knew about the sexual transmission of Zika and adopted sexual prevention measures.
Our findings suggest that there are gaps in knowledge about the risks and transmission of Zika and travelers with low knowledge are less likely to engage in the appropriate prevention methods. Significantly, few U.S. travelers have knowledge of the sexual transmission of Zika and, accordingly, there is less overall engagement with prevention measures for this transmission mechanism than for vector-borne transmission.
本研究旨在调查哪些因素可预测美国旅行者对寨卡病毒传播、症状和治疗的了解程度,此外还评估寨卡知识如何影响个人防护行为的采用。
数据是作为 2017 年 6 月一项基于美国旅行者的概率性互联网小组调查研究的一部分收集的。我们对预测寨卡知识(高 vs. 低)的因素和预测个人防护措施采用的知识的因素进行了逻辑回归模型分析。
我们发现,前往寨卡流行国家旅行和旅行者的性别均与更高的寨卡知识显著相关(比值比(OR):1.48,95%置信区间(CI):1.14-1.93 和 OR:1.44,95%CI:1.08-1.92),调整了年龄、种族、教育、收入和旅行目的。此外,在前往寨卡流行国家的旅行者中,与知识较低的旅行者相比,知识较高的个体更有可能采取预防措施。然而,很少有旅行者了解寨卡的性传播,并且采取了性预防措施。
我们的研究结果表明,关于寨卡风险和传播的知识存在差距,知识水平较低的旅行者不太可能采用适当的预防方法。重要的是,很少有美国旅行者了解寨卡的性传播,因此,与通过媒介传播的机制相比,总体上对这种传播机制的预防措施的参与度较低。