Suppr超能文献

人类生殖系基因编辑中的负责任创新。ESHG和ESHRE建议的背景文件。

Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.

作者信息

de Wert Guido, Heindryckx Björn, Pennings Guido, Clarke Angus, Eichenlaub-Ritter Ursula, van El Carla G, Forzano Francesca, Goddijn Mariëtte, Howard Heidi C, Radojkovic Dragica, Rial-Sebbag Emmanuelle, Dondorp Wybo, Tarlatzis Basil C, Cornel Martina C

机构信息

Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Fac. of Health, Medicine and the Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, The Netherlands.

Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 12;2018(1):hox024. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox024. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, pre-clinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g. gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g. safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns.

摘要

基因编辑技术的发展引发了人们对其临床应用的高度期望,包括生殖系编辑。欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)和欧洲人类遗传学学会(ESHG)共同编写了一份背景文件和建议,以促进并激发当前正在进行的社会辩论。本文件提供了这些建议的背景信息。目前,许多国家禁止进行生殖系基因编辑。这使得在这些国家无法开展临床应用,即便生殖系基因编辑能够变得安全有效。这项立法背后的论据是什么,它们如今是否仍然具有说服力?如果一项技术能够以安全有效的方式帮助避免严重的遗传疾病,这是否足以成为重新审视先前立场的理由?本背景文件总结了有关生殖系基因编辑的科学进展与期望、欧洲层面的法律法规以及针对三种不同情形(基础研究、临床前研究和临床应用)的伦理问题。从伦理角度来看,我们认为道义论的反对意见(例如基因编辑违背自然)似乎缺乏说服力,而后果论的反对意见(例如由此孕育的儿童及其后代的安全性)则需要进行研究,而在欧洲国家当前的法律状况下,并非所有研究都被允许。编写这份背景文件和建议体现了一种责任,即帮助社会理解并辩论这些新技术可能产生的各种影响,并为适应该领域动态发展的法规做出贡献,同时兼顾伦理考量和社会关切。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验