Trystuła Mariusz, Tomaszewski Tomasz, Pąchalska Maria
Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Interventions, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Department of Neurology with a Stroke Unit and the Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(2):226-233. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.84441. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
Atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (CS)-related strokes are a significant overall stroke burden contributor.
To evaluate the effect of surgical (carotid endarterectomy - CEA) vs. percutaneous (neuroprotected carotid artery stenting - CAS) carotid revascularization on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in stroke survivors: analysis controlled for major HRQoL determinants beyond strokes.
Our database of 856 carotid revascularization procedures (48.7% symptomatic CS) performed over 3 years showed 42 pairs (CEA-CAS) of right hemispheric stroke patients matched for age, sex, marital and educational status, hyper-tension, heart failure and diabetes, who underwent uneventful carotid revascularization, experienced no major adverse clinical events, and completed the Short Form Outcome Study (SF-36) questionnaire within 7 days before, 14 days after, 6 months after, and 12 months after carotid revascularization.
Baseline HRQoL was low and similar in both groups (30.8 ±4.6% vs. 29.1 ±3.9%, = 0.68; data given for CEA vs. CAS). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale chronic severity was 5.4 ±2.8 vs. 5.9 ±3.1 ( = 0.44). Revascularization was associated with a major HRQoL improvement, that was significantly greater in CAS (60.4 ±9.2% vs. 71.5 ±6.2%, < 0.001). At 6 months the CEA-CAS difference was narrower (70.7 ±9.7% vs. 74.6 ±5.9%, = 0.026), becoming statistically insignificant at 12 months (72.6 ±6.7% vs. 75.1 ±5.1%, = 0.062). The early CEA-CAS difference was driven by less bodily pain and better physical functioning/role-physical plus better role-emotional and higher general well-being scores in CAS ( < 0.05).
Carotid revascularization has a major positive impact on stroke survivor patient-reported HRQoL. The improvement is initially greater in CAS, with the remaining difference small at 12 months and statistically insignificant.
动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄(CS)相关的中风是总体中风负担的一个重要因素。
评估手术(颈动脉内膜切除术 - CEA)与经皮(神经保护颈动脉支架置入术 - CAS)颈动脉血运重建对中风幸存者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响:分析中对中风以外的主要HRQoL决定因素进行了控制。
我们的数据库包含3年内进行的856例颈动脉血运重建手术(48.7%为有症状的CS),显示有42对(CEA - CAS)右半球中风患者,这些患者在年龄、性别、婚姻和教育状况、高血压、心力衰竭和糖尿病方面相匹配,他们接受了顺利的颈动脉血运重建,未发生重大不良临床事件,并在颈动脉血运重建前7天、术后14天、6个月和12个月完成了简明健康状况调查(SF - 36)问卷。
两组的基线HRQoL较低且相似(30.8±4.6%对29.1±3.9%,P = 0.68;数据为CEA对CAS)。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表慢性严重程度为5.4±2.8对5.9±3.1(P = 0.44)。血运重建与HRQoL的显著改善相关,CAS组的改善明显更大(60.4±9.2%对71.5±6.2%,P < 0.001)。在6个月时,CEA - CAS差异变窄(70.7±9.7%对74.6±5.9%,P = 0.026),在12个月时无统计学意义(72.6±6.7%对75.1±5.1%,P = 0.062)。早期CEA - CAS差异是由CAS组中身体疼痛较少、身体功能/角色 - 身体状况更好以及角色 - 情感状况更好和总体幸福感得分更高所驱动的(P < 0.05)。
颈动脉血运重建对中风幸存者患者报告的HRQoL有重大积极影响。最初CAS组的改善更大,12个月时剩余差异较小且无统计学意义。