Department of Geriatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Dec;67(12):2650-2657. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16149. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Geriatricians are often confronted with unexpected health outcomes in older adults with complex multimorbidity. Aging researchers have recently called for a focus on physical resilience as a new approach to explaining such outcomes. Physical resilience, defined as the ability to resist functional decline or recover health following a stressor, is an emerging construct.
Based on an outline of the state-of-the-art in research on the measurement of physical resilience, this article describes what tests to predict resilience can already be used in clinical practice and which innovations are to be expected soon.
An older adult's recovery potential is currently predicted by static tests of physiological reserves. Although geriatric medicine typically adopts a multidisciplinary view of the patient and implicitly performs resilience management to a certain extent, clinical management of older adults can benefit from explicitly applying the dynamical concept of resilience. Two crucial leads for advancing our capacity to measure and manage the resilience of individual patients are advocated: first, performing multiple repeated measurements around a stressor can provide insight about the patient's dynamic responses to stressors; and, second, linking psychological and physiological subsystems, as proposed by network studies on resilience, can provide insight into dynamic interactions involved in a resilient response.
A big challenge still lies ahead in translating the dynamical concept of resilience into clinical tools and guidelines. As a first step in bridging this gap, this article outlines what opportunities clinicians and researchers can already exploit to improve prediction, understanding, and management of resilience of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2650-2657, 2019.
老年病医生经常会遇到患有复杂多种疾病的老年人出现意外健康结果的情况。老年研究人员最近呼吁关注身体弹性,将其作为一种解释此类结果的新方法。身体弹性定义为在受到压力源后抵抗功能下降或恢复健康的能力,是一个新兴的概念。
本文根据身体弹性测量研究的最新进展概述,描述了哪些测试可以预测身体弹性,这些测试目前已经可以在临床实践中使用,以及哪些创新即将出现。
目前,老年人的恢复潜力可以通过生理储备的静态测试来预测。尽管老年医学通常采用多学科的患者观点,并在一定程度上隐含地进行弹性管理,但对老年人的临床管理可以受益于明确应用弹性的动态概念。本文提倡了两个推进个体患者弹性测量和管理能力的关键线索:首先,在压力源周围进行多次重复测量可以提供有关患者对压力源的动态反应的见解;其次,如弹性的网络研究中提出的,将心理和生理子系统联系起来,可以深入了解弹性反应中涉及的动态相互作用。
将弹性的动态概念转化为临床工具和指南仍然面临巨大挑战。作为弥合这一差距的第一步,本文概述了临床医生和研究人员已经可以利用哪些机会来提高对老年人弹性的预测、理解和管理。美国老年学会杂志 67:2650-2657, 2019。