Suppr超能文献

美国分娩住院期间无指征使用抗生素。

Antibiotic Use Without Indication During Delivery Hospitalizations in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;134(4):718-725. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze trends in unindicated antibiotic use during vaginal delivery hospitalization.

METHODS

This study used an administrative database to analyze antibiotic use during delivery hospitalizations from January 2006 to March 2015. Women were classified by mode of delivery and whether they had an evidence-based indication for antibiotics. Indications for antibiotics included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), cesarean delivery, group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, urinary tract infections, and other infections. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess trends of antibiotic administration. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses for antibiotic receipt including demographic, hospital, and obstetric and medical factors were performed with unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs as measures of association.

RESULTS

A total of 5,536,756 delivery hospitalizations, including 2,872,286 vaginal deliveries without an indication for antibiotics, were analyzed. The most common indication for antibiotics was cesarean delivery (33.6% of the entire cohort), followed by GBS colonization (15.8%), chorioamnionitis (1.7%), preterm PROM (1.6%), endometritis (1.2%), urinary tract infections (0.6%), and other infections (total less than 0.5%). The proportion of women receiving unindicated antibiotics decreased 44.4%, from 38.1% in 2006 to 21.2% in 2015. Adjusted risk for receipt of unindicated antibiotics was lower in 2015 vs 2006 (adjusted RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.55-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Use of antibiotics during vaginal delivery hospitalizations without an indication for antibiotic use declined significantly based on an analysis of a large administrative data set.

摘要

目的

分析阴道分娩住院期间无指征使用抗生素的趋势。

方法

本研究使用行政数据库分析了 2006 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月期间分娩住院期间的抗生素使用情况。根据分娩方式和是否有抗生素使用的依据将女性进行分类。抗生素使用的依据包括早产胎膜早破(PROM)、剖宫产、B 组链球菌(GBS)定植、绒毛膜羊膜炎、子宫内膜炎、尿路感染和其他感染。采用 Cochran-Armitage 检验评估抗生素使用的趋势。对包括人口统计学、医院和产科及医学因素在内的抗生素使用进行了未经调整和调整后的分析,使用未经调整和调整后的风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)作为关联的衡量指标。

结果

共分析了 5536756 例分娩住院病例,其中 2872286 例阴道分娩无抗生素使用指征。抗生素使用的最常见依据是剖宫产(整个队列的 33.6%),其次是 GBS 定植(15.8%)、绒毛膜羊膜炎(1.7%)、早产 PROM(1.6%)、子宫内膜炎(1.2%)、尿路感染(0.6%)和其他感染(总数小于 0.5%)。接受无指征抗生素治疗的女性比例下降了 44.4%,从 2006 年的 38.1%降至 2015 年的 21.2%。与 2006 年相比,2015 年接受无指征抗生素治疗的风险较低(调整后的 RR 0.56,95%CI 0.55-0.57)。

结论

根据对大型行政数据集的分析,阴道分娩住院期间无抗生素使用指征的抗生素使用明显下降。

相似文献

2
Vancomycin during delivery hospitalizations for women with group B streptococcus.产妇产程中使用万古霉素治疗 B 组链球菌感染
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(5):898-906. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1733520. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2023 Mar;50(1):137-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2022.10.011.
10
Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term.足月或接近足月时胎膜早破的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 29;2014(10):CD001807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001807.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Antibiotic use during pregnancy: how bad is it?孕期使用抗生素:危害有多大?
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 17;14(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0636-0.
4
A Randomized Trial Comparing Skin Antiseptic Agents at Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产术中皮肤消毒剂比较的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):647-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511048. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics.产科抗生素预防
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):559-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.039.
7
Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection.用于治疗羊膜腔内感染的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 19;2014(12):CD010976. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010976.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验