Frennert Susanne, Baudin Katarina
School of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Health, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
School of Health Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 May;43(9):1220-1227. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1661035. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
An ageing population presents a challenge for municipal eldercare in Sweden due to difficulties recruiting staff and there being a strained economy. A strategy involving welfare technology is presented as one such solution. An important group to carry out this strategy involves those who work with welfare technology in municipal eldercare. In this paper we describe their perception of welfare technology, and the challenges and opportunities they perceive in utilizing it.
A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to all Swedish municipalities and answered by 393 respondents. Analyses show that the respondents were representative of the different professions who work with welfare technology within municipal eldercare.
Welfare technology was perceived as being more reliable and safer than humans with regards to supervisions and reminders. The respondents acknowledged factors that slowed down the implementation of welfare technology in municipal eldercare organizations, such as resistance to change, lack of finances, lack of supporting evidence, lack of infrastructure, high staff turnover, difficulties with procurement and uncertainties about responsibility and laws.
We found that the people who work with and make decisions about welfare technology in municipal eldercare organizations were generally very positive about the deployment and use of such technology, but there appear to be problems within municipal eldercare organizations to realize this vision. The lack of structured implementation processes and coherent evaluation models indicates inequality of the access to welfare technology and, as a result, even though Swedish eldercare is publicly funded, the availability of welfare technologies and their usage differ between municipalities.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe research findings show that implementing welfare technologies in municipal eldercare must include transformed working processes and long-term strategies or they may lead to conflicts of priorities or unstructured implementation processes.Structured implementation processes and coherent evaluation models are needed for equality of access and availability of welfare technologies in municipal eldercare.High staff turnover negatively affects the deployment of welfare technology and the root cause of high staff turnover needs to be addressed.
由于招聘员工困难且经济紧张,人口老龄化给瑞典的市政老年护理带来了挑战。提出了一项涉及福利技术的战略作为一种解决方案。实施这一战略的一个重要群体包括在市政老年护理中从事福利技术工作的人员。在本文中,我们描述了他们对福利技术的看法,以及他们在使用福利技术时所察觉到的挑战和机遇。
向瑞典所有市政当局发放了一份自填式在线问卷,共有393名受访者作答。分析表明,受访者代表了市政老年护理中从事福利技术工作的不同职业。
在监督和提醒方面,福利技术被认为比人工更可靠、更安全。受访者认识到一些阻碍市政老年护理机构实施福利技术的因素,如抵制变革、资金短缺、缺乏支持证据、缺乏基础设施、员工流动率高、采购困难以及责任和法律方面的不确定性。
我们发现,在市政老年护理机构中从事福利技术工作并做出决策的人员总体上对这类技术的部署和使用非常积极,但市政老年护理机构内部似乎存在问题,难以实现这一愿景。缺乏结构化的实施流程和连贯的评估模型表明,福利技术的获取存在不平等现象,因此,尽管瑞典的老年护理由公共资金资助,但各市政当局之间福利技术的可用性及其使用情况存在差异。
对康复的启示
研究结果表明,在市政老年护理中实施福利技术必须包括转变工作流程和制定长期战略,否则可能导致优先事项冲突或实施流程缺乏条理。
为了在市政老年护理中实现福利技术获取和平等可用性,需要结构化的实施流程和连贯的评估模型。
高员工流动率对福利技术的部署产生负面影响,需要解决高员工流动率的根本原因。