Politicizing the Precautionary Principle: Why Disregarding Facts Should Not Pass for Farsightedness.
作者信息
Aerni Philipp
机构信息
Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
出版信息
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Aug 26;10:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01053. eCollection 2019.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Politicizing the Precautionary Principle: Why Disregarding Facts Should Not Pass for Farsightedness.
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Aug 26;10:1053. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01053. eCollection 2019.
2
[Revocation of authorizations on GMO under the precautionary principle (with special attention to the Justice Tribunal of the European Communities].
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2003 Jan-Jun(18):139-61.
3
[The precautionary principle: between responsibility and policy].
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):881-94; discussion 894-5.
4
The precautionary principle and the regulation of U.S. food and drug safety.
J Med Philos. 2004 Jun;29(3):333-50. doi: 10.1080/03605310490500536.
5
The precautionary principle: is it safe.
Eur J Health Law. 2013 Jun;20(3):261-70. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341272.
6
Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants.
Transgenic Res. 2003 Dec;12(6):639-47. doi: 10.1023/b:trag.0000005157.45046.8e.
7
[Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):969-93.
8
The precautionary principle and/or risk assessment in World Trade Organization decisions: a possible role for risk perception.
Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):491-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00452.x.
9
The precautionary principle and chemicals regulation: past achievements and future possibilities.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Sep;13(5):342-9. doi: 10.1065/espr2006.06.312.
10
On risk and regulation: Bt crops in India.
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jul 3;5(3):204-9. doi: 10.4161/21645698.2014.950543.
引用本文的文献
1
Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-41. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2252947. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
2
Strategies to produce T-DNA free CRISPRed fruit trees via Agrobacterium tumefaciens stable gene transfer.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 19;10(1):20155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77110-1.
3
Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 25;11:582011. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582011. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Genetic Alterations That Do or Do Not Occur Naturally; Consequences for Genome Edited Organisms in the Context of Regulatory Oversight.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Jan 16;6:213. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00213. eCollection 2018.
2
A comparison of the EU regulatory approach to directed mutagenesis with that of other jurisdictions, consequences for international trade and potential steps forward.
New Phytol. 2019 Jun;222(4):1673-1684. doi: 10.1111/nph.15627. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Neuromarketing empirical approaches and food choice: A systematic review.
Food Res Int. 2018 Jun;108:650-664. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.049. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences.
J Pest Sci (2004). 2017;90(3):855-864. doi: 10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
European incoherence on GMO cultivation versus importation.
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Jul 12;34(7):694-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3588.
6
How to be Cautious but Open to Learning: Time to Update Biotechnology and GMO Legislation.
Risk Anal. 2016 Aug;36(8):1513-7. doi: 10.1111/risa.12647. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Genomic misconception: a fresh look at the biosafety of transgenic and conventional crops. A plea for a process agnostic regulation.
N Biotechnol. 2014 Jan 25;31(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 15.
Zotero 插件