Suppr超能文献

用于分类家庭保健护理强度和评估护理人员配置资源的患者分类系统:范围综述。

Patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity and assess nursing staffing resources in home health care: A scoping review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov;99:103361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity in the assessment of nursing staffing resources currently used in home health care, with a special emphasis on validity, reliability and staff allocation.

DESIGN

Scoping review of internationally published and grey literature, based on a methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of the electronic databases Cinahl, Medline, Embase and SweMed, the websites Google and Google Scholar and hand searches of reference lists occurred. Eligibility criteria included (A) a focus on patient classification systems measuring nursing intensity and workload in home health care and (B) published in English between January 2007 and March 2019. In level one testing two team members screened titles and abstracts, in level two testing two team members determined which papers should undergo a full text review. Data were extracted using structured extraction by one team member and verified by two other members.

RESULTS

Thirteen peer-reviewed articles and grey literature documents were identified, from Canada, Ireland, the UK, the USA, Scotland, Turkey and the Netherlands. Four patient classification systems had been tested for both validity and reliability. Validity was tested through face validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity or content validity index. Reliability was tested through stability, internal consistency, observer agreement or inter rater reliability. One patient classification system had been tested only for reliability, through interrater reliability and observer agreement. Two patient classification systems had been evaluated through summative evaluation; one qualitatively through focus group interviews and one through semi-structured interviews. Only one patient classification system had been validity and reliability tested and evaluated. Overall, the patient classification systems in the included papers (13) were considered to have benefits and to be appropriate for the measurement of patients' needs, workload and allocation of staff, although specific information was not always given.

CONCLUSION

Little has been published on validity or reliability tested patient classification systems linked to staffing allocation in home health care in the past decade. Limited research was seen where a patient classification system was considered to be fully operational in home health care.

摘要

目的

确定目前用于家庭保健护理人员配备资源评估的护理强度患者分类系统,特别强调其有效性、可靠性和人员配置。

设计

基于 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法学框架,对国际发表和灰色文献进行范围综述。

数据来源

在 Cinahl、Medline、Embase 和 SweMed 电子数据库、Google 和 Google Scholar 网站以及参考文献列表的手工搜索中进行搜索。纳入标准包括(A)重点关注测量家庭保健护理中护理强度和工作量的患者分类系统,以及(B)2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间以英文发表的文献。在一级测试中,两名团队成员筛选标题和摘要,在二级测试中,两名团队成员确定哪些论文应进行全文审查。由一名团队成员使用结构化提取方法提取数据,并由另外两名成员进行验证。

结果

确定了来自加拿大、爱尔兰、英国、美国、苏格兰、土耳其和荷兰的 13 篇同行评议文章和灰色文献。已经对四种患者分类系统进行了有效性和可靠性测试。有效性通过表面有效性、预测有效性、同期有效性或内容有效性指数进行测试。可靠性通过稳定性、内部一致性、观察者一致性或评分者间可靠性进行测试。一种患者分类系统仅通过评分者间可靠性和观察者一致性进行了可靠性测试。两种患者分类系统通过总结性评估进行了评估;一种通过焦点小组访谈进行定性评估,另一种通过半结构化访谈进行评估。只有一种患者分类系统进行了有效性和可靠性测试和评估。总体而言,纳入研究的患者分类系统(13 个)被认为具有益处,并且适合测量患者的需求、工作量和人员配置,尽管并非总是提供具体信息。

结论

在过去十年中,关于与家庭保健护理人员配置相关的经过有效性或可靠性测试的患者分类系统的出版物很少。在一个患者分类系统被认为在家庭保健护理中完全可行的有限研究中看到了这种情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验