Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Endocr Rev. 2020 Apr 1;41(2):320-44. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnz001.
Synthetic progestogens (progestins) have been linked to increased breast cancer risk; however, the role of endogenous progesterone in breast physiology and carcinogenesis is less clearly defined. Mechanistic studies using cell culture, tissue culture, and preclinical models implicate progesterone in breast carcinogenesis. In contrast, limited epidemiologic data generally do not show an association of circulating progesterone levels with risk, and it is unclear whether this reflects methodologic limitations or a truly null relationship. Challenges related to defining the role of progesterone in breast physiology and neoplasia include: complex interactions with estrogens and other hormones (eg, androgens, prolactin, etc.), accounting for timing of blood collections for hormone measurements among cycling women, and limitations of assays to measure progesterone metabolites in blood and progesterone receptor isotypes (PRs) in tissues. Separating the individual effects of estrogens and progesterone is further complicated by the partial dependence of PR transcription on estrogen receptor (ER)α-mediated transcriptional events; indeed, interpreting the integrated interaction of the hormones may be more essential than isolating independent effects. Further, many of the actions of both estrogens and progesterone, particularly in "normal" breast tissues, are driven by paracrine mechanisms in which ligand binding to receptor-positive cells evokes secretion of factors that influence cell division of neighboring receptor-negative cells. Accordingly, blood and tissue levels may differ, and the latter are challenging to measure. Given conflicting data related to the potential role of progesterone in breast cancer etiology and interest in blocking progesterone action to prevent or treat breast cancer, we provide a review of the evidence that links progesterone to breast cancer risk and suggest future directions for filling current gaps in our knowledge.
合成孕激素(孕激素)已被证明与乳腺癌风险增加有关;然而,内源性孕酮在乳腺生理和致癌作用中的作用还不太明确。使用细胞培养、组织培养和临床前模型的机制研究表明,孕酮参与了乳腺癌的发生。相比之下,有限的流行病学数据通常没有显示循环孕酮水平与风险之间存在关联,目前尚不清楚这是反映了方法学上的局限性还是真正的零关联。与定义孕酮在乳腺生理和肿瘤发生中的作用相关的挑战包括:与雌激素和其他激素(如雄激素、催乳素等)的复杂相互作用,需要考虑到在循环女性中采集激素测量的血液样本的时间,以及测量血液中孕酮代谢物和组织中孕酮受体同工型(PRs)的检测方法的局限性。由于 PR 转录部分依赖于雌激素受体(ER)α介导的转录事件,因此雌激素和孕酮的个体作用的分离更加复杂;事实上,解释激素的综合相互作用可能比分离独立的作用更为重要。此外,雌激素和孕酮的许多作用,尤其是在“正常”乳腺组织中,都是由旁分泌机制驱动的,其中配体与受体阳性细胞结合会引发影响相邻受体阴性细胞分裂的因子的分泌。因此,血液和组织水平可能不同,并且后者难以测量。鉴于与孕激素在乳腺癌病因学中的潜在作用相关的相互矛盾的数据以及对阻断孕激素作用以预防或治疗乳腺癌的兴趣,我们提供了一份关于将孕激素与乳腺癌风险联系起来的证据综述,并提出了未来填补我们知识空白的方向。